M. Miles
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 2%
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Diane Holditch‐DavisJanice WereszczakAnders HåkanssonEmma Claesdotter‐KnutssonSabina Kapetanovic
- Topics
- Disability Rights and Representation (10 papers)Family and Disability Support Research (10 papers)Infant Development and Preterm Care (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPakistanSweden
In The Last Decade
M. Miles
40 papers receiving 744 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 548
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 338
- Clinical Psychology 285
- Safety Research 138
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 131
Countries citing papers authored by M. Miles
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Miles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Miles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Miles. The network helps show where M. Miles may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Miles
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Miles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Miles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Miles. M. Miles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | Resilience of South Asian disabling conditions: a glimpse of lathyrism among comparative histories | 1 |
| 4 | Knowledge and management of disabling conditions in South Asian histories: implications for leprosy futures. | 2 |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | Parental Stressor Scale Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (PSS:NICU) 1991 | 1 |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 209 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 124 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | Disability Policies in Pakistan: Is Anyone Winning?. | 0 |
| 20 | 9 |
About M. Miles
M. Miles is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Safety Research and Human Factors and Ergonomics, having authored 45 papers that have together received 887 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Disability Rights and Representation (10 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (10 papers) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (338 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (548 citations) and Pharmacy (86 citations). M. Miles has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Pakistan and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Diane Holditch‐Davis, Janice Wereszczak, Anders Håkansson, Emma Claesdotter‐Knutsson and Sabina Kapetanovic. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Social Science & Medicine and Disability and Rehabilitation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.