Kathryn L. Ricker
- Research and Theory top 1%
- Emergency Medical Services top 2%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Motor Control and Adaptation 9
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions 4
-
- Human-Automation Interaction and Safety 5
-
- Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology 4
-
- Psychometric Methodologies and Testing 3
-
- Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques 2
-
- Reliability and Agreement in Measurement 2
-
- Healthcare Policy and Management 1
- Co-authors
- Carole A. EstabrooksPhyllis GiovannettiGreta G. CummingsWilliam K. MidodziDigby ElliottWerner HelsenJanet L. StarkesCharles Humphrey
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Kathryn L. Ricker
20 papers receiving 941 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Research and Theory 149
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 95
- Emergency Medical Services 149
- General Health Professions 396
- Cognitive Neuroscience 298
Countries citing papers authored by Kathryn L. Ricker
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn L. Ricker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn L. Ricker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn L. Ricker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kathryn L. Ricker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn L. Ricker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn L. Ricker. The network helps show where Kathryn L. Ricker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Kathryn L. Ricker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 48 | |
| 2 | Single- versus Double-Scoring of Trend Responses in Trend Score Equating with Constructed-Response Tests. Research Report. ETS RR-10-12. | 2010 | 0 |
| 3 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 51 | |
| 6 | The Impact of Anchor Test Length on Equating Results in a Nonequivalent Groups Design. Research Report. ETS RR-07-44. | 2007 | 3 |
| 7 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 50 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 370 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 116 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 27 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 89 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 60 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 30 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 11 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 15 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 14 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 88 |
About Kathryn L. Ricker
Kathryn L. Ricker is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience and Family Practice, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Motor Control and Adaptation (9 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (5 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (4 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (3 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (2 papers), Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (2 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (149 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (95 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (149 citations). Kathryn L. Ricker has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Carole A. Estabrooks, Phyllis Giovannetti, Greta G. Cummings, William K. Midodzi, Digby Elliott, Werner Helsen, Janet L. Starkes, Charles Humphrey, Romeo Chua and Daniel J. Weeks. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Ergonomics and Nursing Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.