Kathryn Jane Gardner

1.4k citations
40 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 17

Kathryn Jane Gardner

36 papers receiving 932 citations

Peers

Kathryn Jane Gardner
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Clinical Psychology 544
  • Social Psychology 435
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 222
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 126
  • Applied Psychology 38
Replace Vicente E. Caballo with:
Vicente E. Caballo Spain
Juan Antonio Moriana Spain
Martin Melchers Germany
Marianne Leuzinger‐Bohleber Germany
Joshua C. Felver United States
Barbara Chuen Yee Lo Hong Kong
Tobias Nolte United Kingdom
Christian Haag Kristensen Brazil
Jennifer L. Hughes United States
Ilya Yaroslavsky United States
Kathryn Jane Gardner relative to Vicente E. Caballo Spain Vicente E. Caballo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Vicente E. Caballo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kathryn Jane Gardner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn Jane Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn Jane Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn Jane Gardner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathryn Jane Gardner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn Jane Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn Jane Gardner. The network helps show where Kathryn Jane Gardner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kathryn Jane Gardner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kathryn Jane Gardner Line = papers co-authored together Kathryn Jane Gardner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20240
4 20239
5 20231
6 20223
7 20225
8 20221
9 20218
10 202118
11 202011
12 201914
13 20166
14 201419
15 20127
16 201019
17 201011
18 2007160
19 200756
20 19854

About Kathryn Jane Gardner

Kathryn Jane Gardner is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (12 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (9 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (6 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (6 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (544 citations), Social Psychology (435 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (222 citations). Kathryn Jane Gardner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Pamela Qualter, H. Whiteley, Amit Anand, Yang Wang, Yu Li, Mark J. Lowe, Debbie Pope, J. Hutchinson, John Archer and Paul Rogers. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Aggressive Behavior, Journal of Affective Disorders, Primary Health Care Research & Development and Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026