Kathleen O’Neill

1.2k citations
27 papers · 829 indexed · h-index 14

Kathleen O’Neill

27 papers receiving 744 citations

Peers

Kathleen O’Neill
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Internal Medicine 81
  • Rehabilitation 91
  • Clinical Psychology 145
  • Physiology 179
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 196
Replace Carolyn Jenkins with:
Carolyn Jenkins United States
Laura M. Bonner United States
Lanshu Zhou China
Steve Fisher United States
Anne Roberts United Kingdom
Manuel Alves Rodrígues Portugal
George Tadros United Kingdom
Jörn Moock Germany
Manuel Ridao-López Spain
Mitra Zolfaghari Iran
Kathleen O’Neill relative to Carolyn Jenkins United States Carolyn Jenkins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Carolyn Jenkins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen O’Neill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen O’Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen O’Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen O’Neill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen O’Neill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen O’Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen O’Neill. The network helps show where Kathleen O’Neill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kathleen O’Neill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kathleen O’Neill Line = papers co-authored together Kathleen O’Neill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 201818
3 201622
4 201623
5 20134
6 201375
7 201152
8 2006241
9 200515
10 200415
11 200210
12 200116
13 20017
14 2001119
15 19994
16 199713
17
Item and test characteristics that are associated with differential item functioning.
1993102
18 199331
19 19936
20
Inexperienced and Anxious Computer Users: Coping with a Computer-Administered Test of Academic Skills. The Praxis Series: Professional Assessments for Beginning Teachers.
19924

About Kathleen O’Neill

Kathleen O’Neill is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Rehabilitation, having authored 27 papers that have together received 829 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (6 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (4 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (4 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (3 papers), Religious Education and Schools (2 papers), Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development (2 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (81 citations), Rehabilitation (91 citations) and Clinical Psychology (145 citations). Kathleen O’Neill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Shyam Prabhakaran, Anthony Papa, George A. Bonanno, Joanna McMillan-Price, Peter Petocz, Jennie Brand‐Miller, Katherine Steinbeck, Samir Samman, Fiona Atkinson and Donald E. Powers. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Stroke and JAMA Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026