Kathleen Murphy
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Health Informatics top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Michael UngarLinda TheronErica Di RuggieroDonald J. WillisonRoss UpshurVincci LuiNeha MalhotraJennifer Gibson
- Topics
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (4 papers)Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers)Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kathleen Murphy
35 papers receiving 724 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- General Health Professions 218
- Health Informatics 149
- Clinical Psychology 106
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 104
- Psychiatry and Mental health 88
Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen Murphy
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen Murphy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen Murphy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen Murphy. The network helps show where Kathleen Murphy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathleen Murphy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathleen Murphy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathleen Murphy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathleen Murphy. Kathleen Murphy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 58 | |
| 11 | Artificial intelligence for good health: a scoping review of the ethics literaturebreakdown → | 220 |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | Pediatric triage guidelines | 5 |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 41 |
About Kathleen Murphy
Kathleen Murphy is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Safety Research and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 770 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (4 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (149 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (79 citations) and Safety Research (76 citations). Kathleen Murphy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Ungar, Linda Theron, Erica Di Ruggiero, Donald J. Willison, Ross Upshur, Vincci Lui, Neha Malhotra, Jennifer Gibson, Jia Cai and Philip Jefferies. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Social Science & Medicine and Journal of the American Society of Nephrology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.