H. James Norton
- Surgery top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 1%
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 0.5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Helen E. GruberEdward N. HanleyJane A. IngramVivek S. TayalGeorge DivineGamal MostafaMichael BlaivasTroy Foster
- Topics
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (23 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (13 papers)Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
H. James Norton
127 papers receiving 4.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 178
- Surgery 1.6k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.1k
- Pharmacology 594
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 519
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 515
Countries citing papers authored by H. James Norton
This map shows the geographic impact of H. James Norton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. James Norton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. James Norton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. James Norton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. James Norton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. James Norton. The network helps show where H. James Norton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. James Norton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. James Norton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. James Norton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. James Norton. H. James Norton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 40 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 86 | |
| 8 | 39 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 39 | |
| 13 | 47 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 104 | |
| 17 | 86 | |
| 18 | 56 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About H. James Norton
H. James Norton is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 128 papers that have together received 4.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (23 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (13 papers) and Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (519 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.1k citations) and Internal Medicine (162 citations). H. James Norton has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Helen E. Gruber, Edward N. Hanley, Jane A. Ingram, Vivek S. Tayal, George Divine, Gamal Mostafa, Michael Blaivas, Troy Foster, Timothy Saunders and Ronald F. Sing. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.