Michael P. Cary

56 papers receiving 848 citations

Peers

Michael P. Cary
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Health Informatics 68
  • Research and Theory 11
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 35
  • Rheumatology 113
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 7
Replace Jun Jie Benjamin Seng with:
Jun Jie Benjamin Seng Singapore
Chau Pham United States
George T. Blike United States
Li Feng Tan Singapore
Sally Wilson Australia
Shaantanu Donde United Kingdom
J. Hoey United States
Laura Flight United Kingdom
Margo Edmunds United States
Reed V. Tuckson United States
Michael P. Cary relative to Jun Jie Benjamin Seng Singapore Jun Jie Benjamin Seng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28×
Jun Jie Benjamin Seng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael P. Cary

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael P. Cary's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael P. Cary with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael P. Cary more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael P. Cary

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael P. Cary. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael P. Cary. The network helps show where Michael P. Cary may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael P. Cary, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael P. Cary Line = papers co-authored together Michael P. Cary links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001113
2 200581
3 202354
4 201051
5 201947
6 202346
7 201538
8 202030
9 202027
10 201725
11 201024
12 201722
13 201720
14 201420
15 201620
16 201619
17 202418
18 201918
19 202217
20 201916

About Michael P. Cary

Michael P. Cary is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Informatics, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 65 papers that have together received 880 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (8 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (5 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (3 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (2 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (68 citations), Research and Theory (11 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (35 citations), Rheumatology (113 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (7 citations). Michael P. Cary has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Chris Sander, Gary D. Bader, Cathleen Colón‐Emeric, Philip J. Schlüter, Mark Slack, Christine Murray, Christopher Maher, Rasheeda K. Hall, Brigit Carter and Schenita D. Randolph. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Outlook, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Journal of the National Medical Association and Journal of Nursing Regulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact