Kate Tchanturia
- Clinical Psychology top 0.05%
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 240
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders 132
- Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies 22
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.1%
- Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues 85
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.2%
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 95
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 14
- Applied Psychology top 1%
-
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents 40
-
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet 13
- Co-authors
- Janet TreasureAmy HarrisonUlrike SchmidtDaniel StåhlHeather WestwoodHelen DaviesMarion RobertsJenni Leppänen
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGeorgiaSpain
In The Last Decade
Kate Tchanturia
273 papers receiving 14.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
- Clinical Psychology 12.8k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 4.9k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 5.1k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.3k
- Applied Psychology 593
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Tchanturia
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Tchanturia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Tchanturia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Tchanturia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Tchanturia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Tchanturia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Tchanturia. The network helps show where Kate Tchanturia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Tchanturia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 8 | A proof-of-concept study applying machine learning methods to putative risk factors for eating disorders: results from the multi-centre European project on healthy eating | 2023 | 13 |
| 9 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 40 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 54 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 78 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 14 | Development and Psychometric Validation of the EDE-QS, a 12 Item Short Form of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q)breakdown → | 2016 | 260 |
| 15 | 2015 | 62 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 56 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 127 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 195 |
About Kate Tchanturia
Kate Tchanturia is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 280 papers that have together received 15.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (240 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (132 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (95 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (85 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (40 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (22 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (14 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (12.8k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (4.9k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (5.1k citations). Kate Tchanturia has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Georgia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Janet Treasure, Amy Harrison, Ulrike Schmidt, Daniel Ståhl, Heather Westwood, Helen Davies, Marion Roberts, Jenni Leppänen, Emma Kinnaird and Carolina López.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.