Kate Stewart
-
- Customer Service Quality and Loyalty 5
- Marketing top 2%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects top 10%
-
- Healthcare Policy and Management 13
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 4
-
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 11
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 5
- Global Health Care Issues 3
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 4
-
- Software Engineering Research 3
- Co-authors
- Laura BradleyMark ColgateDavid C. GrabowskiPauline O’ReillyThomas V. WilliamsElder GrangerThomas W. CroghanPeter J. Neumann
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Kate Stewart
62 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 361
- Marketing 307
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 121
- Information Systems and Management 212
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 18
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Stewart
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Stewart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Stewart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Stewart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Stewart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Stewart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Stewart. The network helps show where Kate Stewart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Stewart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 79 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 10 | Association Between NCQA Patient-Centered Medical Home Recognition for Primary Care Practices and Quality of Care for Children with Disabilities and Special Health Care Needs | 2014 | 1 |
| 11 | Credence Services: Content, credibility, and usefulness of online reviews | 2014 | 2 |
| 12 | Paying More for Primary Care: Can It Help Bend the Medicare Cost Curve? (Issue Brief) | 2012 | 2 |
| 13 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 78 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 21 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 101 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 12 |
About Kate Stewart
Kate Stewart is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, General Health Professions and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (13 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (11 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Software Engineering Research (3 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (361 citations), Marketing (307 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (121 citations). Kate Stewart has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Laura Bradley, Mark Colgate, David C. Grabowski, Pauline O’Reilly, Thomas V. Williams, Elder Granger, Thomas W. Croghan, Peter J. Neumann, Gary B. Smith and Debbie Knight.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.