Kate Stewart

62 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Kate Stewart
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 361
  • General Health Professions 359
  • Marketing 307
  • Sociology and Political Science 218
  • Information Systems and Management 212
Replace Craig M. Froehle with:
Craig M. Froehle United States
Manda Broekhuis Netherlands
Lesley White Australia
Eric W. Ford United States
Martin Kitchener United States
Sharon Schweikhart United States
Gary J. Young United States
Ramin Ravangard Iran
C. Sicotte Canada
Lise Lamothe Canada
Kate Stewart relative to Craig M. Froehle United States Craig M. Froehle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Craig M. Froehle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Stewart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Stewart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Stewart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Stewart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Stewart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Stewart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Stewart. The network helps show where Kate Stewart may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Stewart

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Stewart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Stewart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Stewart. Kate Stewart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 0
3 1
4 3
5 9
6 3
7 79
8 1
9 1
10
Association Between NCQA Patient-Centered Medical Home Recognition for Primary Care Practices and Quality of Care for Children with Disabilities and Special Health Care Needs
1
11
Credence Services: Content, credibility, and usefulness of online reviews
2
12
Paying More for Primary Care: Can It Help Bend the Medicare Cost Curve? (Issue Brief)
2
13 4
14 78
15 1
16 21
17 101
18 3
19 11
20 12

About Kate Stewart

Kate Stewart is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, General Health Professions and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (13 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (11 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (361 citations), Marketing (307 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (121 citations). Kate Stewart has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Laura Bradley, Mark Colgate, David C. Grabowski, Pauline O’Reilly, Thomas V. Williams, Elder Granger, Thomas W. Croghan, Peter J. Neumann, Gary B. Smith and Debbie Knight. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and Medical Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026