M Wilmoth

32 papers receiving 667 citations

Peers

M Wilmoth
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Oncology 360
  • Research and Theory 9
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 93
  • General Health Professions 90
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 64
Replace Isabel White with:
Isabel White United Kingdom
Ragnhild Johanne Tveit Sekse Norway
Linda U. Krebs United States
Gül Pınar Türkiye
Constantina Papadopoulou United Kingdom
Tanja Zimmermann Germany
Bibbi Thomé Sweden
Tamryn F. Gray United States
Amanda Hordern Australia
Robin M. Lally United States
M Wilmoth relative to Isabel White United Kingdom Isabel White's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Isabel White · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M Wilmoth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M Wilmoth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M Wilmoth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M Wilmoth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M Wilmoth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M Wilmoth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M Wilmoth. The network helps show where M Wilmoth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M Wilmoth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M Wilmoth Line = papers co-authored together M Wilmoth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001136
2 200791
3 200470
4 200063
5 200551
6 200747
7 200637
8 201130
9 200627
10 201324
11 202122
12 201016
13
A comparison of the effects of lumpectomy versus mastectomy on sexual behaviors.
199515
14 199913
15 201411
16 199610
17 20169
18
Development and psychometric testing of the Wilmoth Sexual Behaviors Questionnaire-Female.
20019
19 20188
20 20036

About M Wilmoth

M Wilmoth is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Oncology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 731 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (8 papers), Family Support in Illness (6 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2 papers) and Sexual function and dysfunction studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (360 citations), Research and Theory (9 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (93 citations), General Health Professions (90 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (64 citations). M Wilmoth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Carina Berterö, Elizabeth Ann Coleman, Steven C. Smith, Carol Beth Stewart, Lorraine Tulman, Nelda Samarel, Eileen G. Collins, Rebecca Rutherford Kitzmiller, Susan Shapiro and Patricia A. Patrician. Their work appears in journals such as Oncology nursing forum, Nursing Outlook, Cancer Nursing, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing and JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact