Kate Peirce

641 total citations
16 papers, 453 citations indexed

About

Kate Peirce is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Peirce has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 453 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Gender Studies, 4 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Kate Peirce's work include Media, Gender, and Advertising (7 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (4 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers). Kate Peirce is often cited by papers focused on Media, Gender, and Advertising (7 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (4 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers). Kate Peirce collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Kate Peirce's co-authors include Bridget M. Waller, Cátia Correia Caeiro, Sandra McCune, Linda Scheider, Anne M. Burrows, Juliane Kaminski, Michael McBride, Jérôme Micheletta, Emily Edwards and James W. Tankard and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Sex Roles and Mass Communication & Society.

In The Last Decade

Kate Peirce

16 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers

Kate Peirce
M. Nelissen Belgium
Jessica Greenebaum United States
Ana C. Leite United Kingdom
Julie M. Albright United States
Veronika Konok Hungary
Sarah Hall Sternglanz United States
Michael Tamborski United States
Patrick D. Hopkins United States
Megan Earle Canada
Matthew G. Chin United States
M. Nelissen Belgium
Kate Peirce
Citations per year, relative to Kate Peirce Kate Peirce (= 1×) peers M. Nelissen

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Peirce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Peirce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Peirce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Peirce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Peirce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Peirce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Peirce. The network helps show where Kate Peirce may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Peirce

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Peirce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Peirce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Peirce. Kate Peirce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Whitehouse, Jamie, Bridget M. Waller, Emma Wallace, et al.. (2014). Evaluation of Public Engagement Activities to Promote Science in a Zoo Environment. PLoS ONE. 9(11). e113395–e113395. 22 indexed citations
2.
Waller, Bridget M., Kate Peirce, Cátia Correia Caeiro, et al.. (2013). Paedomorphic Facial Expressions Give Dogs a Selective Advantage. PLoS ONE. 8(12). e82686–e82686. 155 indexed citations
3.
Grimes, Tom & Kate Peirce. (2013). Three Reasons Samples Become Separated From Their Populations in Communication Research. Mass Communication & Society. 16(3). 441–459. 2 indexed citations
4.
Peirce, Kate, et al.. (2013). Is There a Transgender Canon?: Information Seeking and Use in the Transgender Community. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI. 13 indexed citations
5.
Waller, Bridget M., et al.. (2012). Evidence of Public Engagement with Science: Visitor Learning at a Zoo-Housed Primate Research Centre. PLoS ONE. 7(9). e44680–e44680. 23 indexed citations
6.
Peirce, Kate, et al.. (2012). How We Learn to Teach. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator. 67(2). 134–144. 3 indexed citations
7.
8.
Peirce, Kate & Michael McBride. (1999). Aunt Jemima Isn't Keeping Up with the Energizer Bunny: Stereotyping of Animated Spokescharacters in Advertising. Sex Roles. 40(11-12). 959–968. 18 indexed citations
9.
Peirce, Kate. (1997). Women's Magazine Fiction: A Content Analysis of the Roles, Attributes, and Occupations of Main Characters. Sex Roles. 37(7-8). 581–593. 12 indexed citations
10.
Peirce, Kate. (1993). Socialization of teenage girls through teen-magazine fiction: The making of a new woman or an old lady?. Sex Roles. 29(1-2). 59–68. 60 indexed citations
11.
Peirce, Kate, et al.. (1990). Interviewing Potential Faculty: Finding the Right Person. The Journalism Educator. 45(3). 60–66. 2 indexed citations
12.
Peirce, Kate. (1990). A feminist theoretical perspective on the socialization of teenage girls through Seventeen magazine. Sex Roles. 23(9-10). 491–500. 96 indexed citations
13.
Peirce, Kate. (1989). Sex‐role stereotyping of children on television: A content analysis of the roles and attributes of child characters. Sociological Spectrum. 9(3). 321–328. 10 indexed citations
14.
Peirce, Kate & Emily Edwards. (1988). Children's construction of fantasy stories: Gender differences in conflict resolution strategies. Sex Roles. 18(7-8). 393–404. 12 indexed citations
15.
Peirce, Kate. (1983). Relation between Time Spent Viewing Television and Children's Writing Skills. Journalism Quarterly. 60(3). 445–448. 5 indexed citations
16.
Tankard, James W. & Kate Peirce. (1982). Alcohol Advertising and Magazine Editorial Content. Journalism Quarterly. 59(2). 302–305. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Nelissen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jessica Greenebaum Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ana C. Leite Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Julie M. Albright Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Veronika Konok Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sarah Hall Sternglanz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michael Tamborski Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patrick D. Hopkins Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Megan Earle Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Matthew G. Chin
Rankless by CCL
2026