Daniel E. Re

2.2k citations
32 papers · 1.0k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel E. Re

32 papers receiving 994 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Re
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 596
  • Marketing 238
  • Developmental Biology 53
  • Sensory Systems 67
  • Museology 50
Replace Jaroslava Varella Valentová with:
Jaroslava Varella Valentová Brazil
Emma Otta Brazil
Christopher D. Watkins United Kingdom
Marianne Peters Australia
Rodrigo A. Cárdenas United States
Khytam Dawood United States
Devendra Singh India
Anthony J. Lee United Kingdom
Michael Stirrat United Kingdom
Thomas R. Alley United States
Daniel E. Re relative to Jaroslava Varella Valentová Brazil Jaroslava Varella Valentová's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jaroslava Varella Valentová · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Re

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Re's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Re with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Re more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Re

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Re. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Re. The network helps show where Daniel E. Re may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Re, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Re Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Re links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201287
2 201168
3 201265
4 201364
5 200960
6 201259
7 201158
8 201255
9 201353
10 201553
11 201447
12 201146
13 201339
14 201536
15 201230
16 201627
17 201523
18 201221
19 201120
20 201716

About Daniel E. Re

Daniel E. Re is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Marketing, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Museology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (24 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (15 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (8 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (5 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (4 papers), Color perception and design (3 papers) and Media, Gender, and Advertising (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (596 citations), Marketing (238 citations), Developmental Biology (53 citations), Sensory Systems (67 citations) and Museology (50 citations). Daniel E. Re has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include David I. Perrett, David R. Feinberg, Dengke Xiao, Nicholas O. Rule, Jillian J.M. O’Connor, Ross Whitehead, Benedict C. Jones, Lisa M. DeBruine, Bernard Tiddeman and Vinet Coetzee. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Perception, Evolutionary Psychology, Social Psychological and Personality Science and Personality and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact