Kate Flint
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Barbara SchneiderDaniel GreeneGregory M. WaltonChristopher HullemanDave PauneskuAlice RobertsJ. O’BrienCintia Hinojosa
- Topics
- Photography and Visual Culture (6 papers)Visual Culture and Art Theory (5 papers)Contemporary Literature and Criticism (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Educational PsychologySigns
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsAustralia
In The Last Decade
Kate Flint
24 papers receiving 623 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Social Psychology 261
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 250
- Education 193
- Literature and Literary Theory 121
- Sociology and Political Science 108
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Flint
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Flint's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Flint with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Flint more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Flint
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Flint. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Flint. The network helps show where Kate Flint may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Flint
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Flint. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Flint based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Flint. Kate Flint is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school.breakdown → | 473 |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 47 | |
| 14 | 60 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | Poetry and politics | 9 |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | The Victorian novelist : social problems and social change | 2 |
| 20 | 4 |
About Kate Flint
Kate Flint is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and History, having authored 36 papers that have together received 772 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photography and Visual Culture (6 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (5 papers) and Contemporary Literature and Criticism (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (250 citations), Social Psychology (261 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (121 citations). Kate Flint has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Schneider, Daniel Greene, Gregory M. Walton, Christopher Hulleman, Dave Paunesku, Alice Roberts, J. O’Brien, Cintia Hinojosa, Carissa Romero and Carol S. Dweck. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Educational Psychology and Signs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.