Kate E. C. Duberley

8 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers

Kate E. C. Duberley
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Biochemistry 61
  • Neurology 102
  • Clinical Biochemistry 33
  • Neurology 39
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 68
Replace Ernesto Miquel with:
Ernesto Miquel Uruguay
Xiaohua Ju United States
Viruna Neergheen United Kingdom
Yea Seul Shin Australia
S Ikebe Japan
Xiao‐Ou Hou China
Jessica D’Amico Italy
Katy A. Barnes United Kingdom
Л. П. Долгачева Russia
Chun‐Hua Hang China
Kate E. C. Duberley relative to Ernesto Miquel Uruguay Ernesto Miquel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.9×
Ernesto Miquel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate E. C. Duberley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate E. C. Duberley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate E. C. Duberley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate E. C. Duberley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate E. C. Duberley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate E. C. Duberley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate E. C. Duberley. The network helps show where Kate E. C. Duberley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate E. C. Duberley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate E. C. Duberley Line = papers co-authored together Kate E. C. Duberley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2013195
2 201473
3 201249
4 201349
5 201319
6
Management of the ataxias : towards best clinical practice
201612
7 20107
8 20132
9 20200

About Kate E. C. Duberley

Kate E. C. Duberley is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Biochemistry, Neurology, Molecular Biology and Neurology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 406 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coenzyme Q10 studies and effects (6 papers), Advanced battery technologies research (3 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers), Biochemical Acid Research Studies (2 papers), Advanced Glycation End Products research (1 paper), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper) and Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (61 citations), Neurology (102 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (33 citations), Neurology (39 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (68 citations). Kate E. C. Duberley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Taiwan and Jamaica. Frequent co-authors include Simon Heales, Annapurna Chalasani, Shamima Rahman, Andrey Y. Abramov, George F. G. Allen, Abi Li, Janice L. Holton, Simon Alexander Samuel Pope, Iain Parry Hargreaves and Andrew John Lees. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, BioFactors, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease and Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact