Kate Crosby
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Religious studies top 2%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Co-authors
- Susan J. ConwayJane M. FergusonC WallacePaul W. WilliamsChris HillJanet HolmshawPeter Harvey
- Topics
- Indian and Buddhist Studies (15 papers)Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (9 papers)Eurasian Exchange Networks (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBrazilSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Kate Crosby
28 papers receiving 179 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Sociology and Political Science 103
- Political Science and International Relations 66
- Religious studies 51
- Anthropology 30
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 29
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Crosby
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Crosby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Crosby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Crosby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Crosby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Crosby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Crosby. The network helps show where Kate Crosby may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Crosby
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Crosby. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Crosby based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Crosby. Kate Crosby is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | Theravada Buddhism: Continuity, Identity and Diversity | 1 |
| 7 | Traditional Theravada Meditation and Its Modern-era Suppression | 7 |
| 8 | Scribal and authorial openings in Theravada manuscripts: The Evidence of the Nevill Collection | 1 |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | The Inheritance of Rahula: abandoned child, boy monk, ideal son and trainee | 2 |
| 12 | 84 | |
| 13 | Gendered Symbols in Theravada Buddhism: Missed Positives in the Representation of the Female | 2 |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | A Theravada Code of Conduct for Good Buddhists: The Upasakamanussavinaya | 4 |
| 16 | What does not get translated in Buddhist Studies and the Impact on Teaching | 1 |
| 17 | The Origin of Pali as a Language Name in Medieval Theravada Literature | 1 |
| 18 | The Bodhicaryāvatāra : a guide to the Buddhist path to awakening | 4 |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Kate Crosby
Kate Crosby is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy and Anthropology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 215 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (15 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (9 papers) and Eurasian Exchange Networks (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (51 citations), Anthropology (30 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (66 citations). Kate Crosby has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Brazil and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Susan J. Conway, Jane M. Ferguson, C Wallace, Paul W. Williams, Chris Hill, Janet Holmshaw and Peter Harvey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Oriental Society, Nordic Journal of Psychiatry and Nursing Standard.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.