Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History and Practices.
1992149 citationsWilhelm Halbfaß, Peter HarveyPacific Affairsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Harvey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Harvey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Harvey more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Harvey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Harvey. The network helps show where Peter Harvey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Harvey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Harvey.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Harvey based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Harvey. Peter Harvey is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Veth, Peter, et al.. (2014). The Australian historic shipwreck preservation project: An interim progress report. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia). 38. 31–40.1 indexed citations
2.
Harvey, Peter. (2013). Buddhist Reflections on "Consumer" and "Consumerism". 20. 334.4 indexed citations
3.
Veth, Peter, Mark Staniforth, Amer Hayat Khan, et al.. (2013). The Australian historic shipwreck preservation project 2012: First report on the background, reburial and 'in-situ' preservation at the 'Clarence' (1841-50). ANU Open Research (Australian National University). 37. 1–19.4 indexed citations
Harvey, Peter. (2011). An analysis of factors related to the kusala/akusala quality of actions in the Pāli tradition. heiDOK (Heidelberg University).2 indexed citations
6.
Harvey, Peter. (2007). Avoiding Unintended Harm to the Environment and the Buddhist Ethic of Intention. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 14.4 indexed citations
7.
Harvey, Peter. (2007). "Freedom of the Will" in the Light of Theravada Buddhist Teachings. Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland). 14. 35.6 indexed citations
Harvey, Peter. (1997). Cancer services. Minding body and soul.. PubMed. 107(5579). 28–9.1 indexed citations
14.
Harvey, Peter. (1996). A review of stabilisation works on the wreck of the William Salthouse in Port Phillip Bay. 20(2). 1.7 indexed citations
15.
Harvey, Peter. (1995). Criteria for Judging the Unwholesomeness of Actions in the Texts of Theravaada Buddhism. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 2. 140–151.5 indexed citations
Halbfaß, Wilhelm & Peter Harvey. (1992). Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History and Practices.. Pacific Affairs. 65(4). 546–546.149 indexed citations breakdown →
Harvey, Peter. (1984). The Symbolism of the Early Stūpa. 7(2). 67–94.3 indexed citations
20.
Harvey, Peter. (1951). Eternal Eve : the history of gynaecology & obstetrics.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.