Maria Heim

583 total citations
17 papers, 174 citations indexed

About

Maria Heim is a scholar working on Religious studies, Social Psychology and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Maria Heim has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 174 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Religious studies, 6 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Maria Heim's work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (14 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (6 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). Maria Heim is often cited by papers focused on Indian and Buddhist Studies (14 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (6 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). Maria Heim collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Maria Heim's co-authors include Padmanabh S. Jaini and has published in prestigious journals such as Emotion Review, Philosophy East and West and Journal of the American Oriental Society.

In The Last Decade

Maria Heim

16 papers receiving 135 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Maria Heim United States	7	77	63	53	44	40	17	174
Roger R. Jackson United States	7	87 1.1×	94 1.5×	35 0.7×	52 1.2×	27 0.7×	15	170
Robert E. Buswell United States	8	167 2.2×	80 1.3×	48 0.9×	58 1.3×	19 0.5×	33	280
Sallie B. King United States	6	129 1.7×	58 0.9×	34 0.6×	41 0.9×	50 1.3×	27	229
Matthew Kapstein France	9	143 1.9×	134 2.1×	68 1.3×	80 1.8×	48 1.2×	37	297
H. L. Seneviratne United States	6	115 1.5×	65 1.0×	69 1.3×	52 1.2×	83 2.1×	19	235
Jan Platvoet Netherlands	10	101 1.3×	23 0.4×	46 0.9×	36 0.8×	15 0.4×	20	176
James P. McDermott United States	6	73 0.9×	64 1.0×	37 0.7×	27 0.6×	40 1.0×	32	150
June McDaniel United States	7	73 0.9×	40 0.6×	57 1.1×	58 1.3×	29 0.7×	19	186
Purushottama Bilimoria Australia	7	46 0.6×	51 0.8×	11 0.2×	71 1.6×	16 0.4×	68	153
Julius Lipner United Kingdom	8	82 1.1×	75 1.2×	25 0.5×	91 2.1×	28 0.7×	34	200

Countries citing papers authored by Maria Heim

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maria Heim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maria Heim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maria Heim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maria Heim

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maria Heim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maria Heim. The network helps show where Maria Heim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maria Heim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maria Heim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maria Heim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maria Heim. Maria Heim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

1.

Heim, Maria. (2023). The Workings of Contempt in Classical Indian Texts. Emotion Review. 15(3). 216–223. 1 indexed citations

2.

Heim, Maria. (2019). The Philosophy of Emotion in Buddhist Philosophy (and a Close Look at Remorse and Regret). 5(1). 2–25.

3.

Heim, Maria. (2019). Buddhist Ethics. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 17 indexed citations

4.

Heim, Maria. (2018). Voice of the Buddha: Buddhaghosa on the Immeasurable Words. 2 indexed citations

5.

Heim, Maria, et al.. (2018). In a Double Way: Nāmarūpa in Buddhaghosa's Phenomenology. Philosophy East and West. 68(4). 1085–1115. 4 indexed citations

6.

Heim, Maria. (2018). The Buddha’s Omniscience and the Immeasurability of Scripture. Oxford University Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations

7.

Heim, Maria. (2018). Voice of the Buddha. Oxford University Press eBooks. 4 indexed citations

8.

Heim, Maria. (2015). She Who Heard Much: Notes on Receiving, Interpreting, and Transmitting Buddhavacana. International Journal of Hindu Studies. 19(1-2). 139–156. 1 indexed citations

9.

Heim, Maria. (2015). Buddhaghosa on the Phenomenology of Love and Compassion. Oxford University Press eBooks. 5 indexed citations

10.

Heim, Maria, et al.. (2014). Recent Work in Moral Anthropology. Journal of Religious Ethics. 42(3). 385–392. 15 indexed citations

11.

Heim, Maria. (2013). The Forerunner of All Things: Buddhaghosa on Mind, Intention, and Agency. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 22 indexed citations

12.

Heim, Maria. (2011). BUDDHIST ETHICS: A Review Essay. Journal of Religious Ethics. 39(3). 571–584. 7 indexed citations

13.

Heim, Maria. (2008). The Conceit of Self-Loathing. Journal of Indian Philosophy. 37(1). 61–74. 4 indexed citations

14.

Heim, Maria. (2006). Toward a “Wider and Juster Initiative”: Recent Comparative Work in Buddhist Ethics. Religion Compass. 1(1). 107–119. 3 indexed citations

15.

Heim, Maria. (2004). Theories of the Gift in South Asia: Hindu, Buddhist, and Jain Reflections on Dana. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 35 indexed citations

16.

Heim, Maria. (2004). Theories of the Gift in South Asia. 46 indexed citations

17.

Heim, Maria & Padmanabh S. Jaini. (2003). Collected Papers on Buddhist Studies. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 123(1). 219–219. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact