Lynda E. Boose
About
In The Last Decade
Lynda E. Boose
9 papers receiving 92 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Literature and Literary Theory 84
- Sociology and Political Science 66
- History 46
- Cultural Studies 22
- Gender Studies 19
Countries citing papers authored by Lynda E. Boose
This map shows the geographic impact of Lynda E. Boose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lynda E. Boose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lynda E. Boose more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lynda E. Boose
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lynda E. Boose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lynda E. Boose. The network helps show where Lynda E. Boose may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lynda E. Boose
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lynda E. Boose. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lynda E. Boose based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lynda E. Boose. Lynda E. Boose is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 52 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 23 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.