Countries citing papers authored by Katarzyna Antosik
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Katarzyna Antosik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katarzyna Antosik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katarzyna Antosik more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Katarzyna Antosik
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katarzyna Antosik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katarzyna Antosik. The network helps show where Katarzyna Antosik may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katarzyna Antosik
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katarzyna Antosik.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katarzyna Antosik based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Katarzyna Antosik. Katarzyna Antosik is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Krzęcio, E., et al.. (2015). Wpływ masy tuszy ciepłej na mięsność oraz wybrane cechy jakości mięsa tuczników z pogłowia masowego. Roczniki Naukowe Polskiego Towarzystwa Zootechnicznego. 11(1).
10.
Antosik, Katarzyna, et al.. (2010). Charakterystyka jakości surowca wieprzowego wybranych grup rasowych tuczników. Roczniki Naukowe Polskiego Towarzystwa Zootechnicznego. 6(4).1 indexed citations
11.
Antosik, Katarzyna, et al.. (2010). Charakterystyka jakości mięsa mięśnia longissimus lumborum tuczników o zróżnicowanej wartości pH24. Roczniki Naukowe Polskiego Towarzystwa Zootechnicznego. 6(4).1 indexed citations
12.
Krzęcio, E., et al.. (2009). QUALITY AND TECHNOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF MEAT FROM LANDRACE-YORKSHIRE × DUROC AND LANDRACE-YORKSHIRE × DUROC-PIETRAIN FATTENERS. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences. 59(4). 329–333.4 indexed citations
Antosik, Katarzyna, et al.. (2006). The influence of H-FABP gene polymorphism on quality and technological value of meat from stress-resistant porkers obtained on the basis of Danish pigs and sharing Duroc blood.. 24(3). 259–265.2 indexed citations
15.
Krzęcio, E., et al.. (2006). The influence of H-FABP gene polymorphism on quality and technological value of meat from stress-resistant Landrace and Landrace × Yorkshire porkers, obtained on the basis of Danish pigs.. 24(3). 251–258.2 indexed citations
16.
Krzęcio, E., et al.. (2004). Meat content and carcass composition as related to sex and RYR1 genotype in pigs from six genetic groups. Animal Science Papers and Reports. 22(4).2 indexed citations
17.
Krzęcio, E., et al.. (2004). Quality and technological value of meat from porkers of six genetic group as related to RYR1T gene. 22(3).2 indexed citations
18.
Antosik, Katarzyna, et al.. (2004). Culinary and technological usefulness of meat fatteners, originated from the crossbreeding of Danish Landrace gilts and Duroc boars, slaughtered at different weights.. 13(3). 297–301.1 indexed citations
19.
Krzęcio, E., et al.. (2003). Quality of raw material of two-breed fatteners orginating from crossing of imported breeds.4 indexed citations
20.
Krzęcio, E., et al.. (2002). The influence of hot carcass weight on lean meat content, meat quality and its technological usefulness in crossbreds of Danish Landrace with Duroc.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.