Kassi Shave
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 3
-
- Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units 3
- Health top 10%
- Social Media in Health Education 3
-
- Infant Development and Preterm Care 3
- Pediatric Pain Management Techniques 3
-
- Delphi Technique in Research 3
-
- Health Literacy and Information Accessibility 3
-
- Child Welfare and Adoption 2
Kassi Shave
14 papers receiving 504 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 71
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 39
- Health 60
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 110
- Health Informatics 7
Countries citing papers authored by Kassi Shave
This map shows the geographic impact of Kassi Shave's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kassi Shave with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kassi Shave more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kassi Shave
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kassi Shave. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kassi Shave. The network helps show where Kassi Shave may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Kassi Shave, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 37 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 36 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 7 | Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviewsbreakdown → | 2017 | 224 |
| 8 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 35 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 73 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 13 |
About Kassi Shave
Kassi Shave is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Safety Research, having authored 14 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (3 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (3 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (3 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers), Social Media in Health Education (3 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (3 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (71 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (39 citations), Health (60 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (110 citations) and Health Informatics (7 citations). Kassi Shave has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Portugal and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Lisa Hartling, Robin Featherstone, Ben Vandermeer, Donna M Dryden, Megan Nuspl, Shannon D. Scott, Samina Ali, Bonnie Lashewicz, Allison Gates and Michele P. Dyson. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Systematic Reviews, Journal of Medical Internet Research, BMC Medical Research Methodology and BMC Pediatrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.