Karen Wright

1.5k citations
33 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 16

Karen Wright

33 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Karen Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Applied Psychology 300
  • Research and Theory 26
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 96
  • Clinical Psychology 366
  • Conservation 56
Replace Katherine Curtis with:
Katherine Curtis United Kingdom
Marilyn Hockenberry‐Eaton United States
Alison Faulkner United Kingdom
Angela Firtko Australia
John J. Spinetta United States
Nancy S. Hogan United States
Nili Tabak Israel
Margareta Rämgård Sweden
Joan Evans Canada
Loretta Jones United States
Karen Wright relative to Katherine Curtis United Kingdom Katherine Curtis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.5×
Katherine Curtis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Karen Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karen Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karen Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen Wright. The network helps show where Karen Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Karen Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Karen Wright Line = papers co-authored together Karen Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20232
2 201634
3 20152
4 201433
5 201356
6 20122
7 20119
8
Landmark Articles From Volumes 31-40 / Des articles-jalons tirés des volumes 31 à 40 - Transforming Hope: How Elderly Palliative Patients Live With Hope
20093
9 200958
10 200953
11 2007138
12 200615
13 200611
14 200559
15 199953
16 199410
17 19917
18 19911
19 198629
20 198462

About Karen Wright

Karen Wright is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Conservation, Research and Theory, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (11 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (8 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (4 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (3 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (3 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (300 citations), Research and Theory (26 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (96 citations), Clinical Psychology (366 citations) and Conservation (56 citations). Karen Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wendy Duggleby, Beth Nachtsheim Bolick, Rebekah Hamilton, Allison Williams, Lorraine Holtslander, Lesley F. Degner, Dan M. Cooper, David R. Popkin, Jill Bally and Shelley Spurr. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Palliative Care, Cancer Nursing, The Arts in Psychotherapy, Journal of Nursing Scholarship and Justice Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026