The Arts in Psychotherapy

2.0k papers and 21.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in The Arts in Psychotherapy in the last decades have received a total of 21.9k indexed citations. Papers published in The Arts in Psychotherapy usually cover Conservation (994 papers), Clinical Psychology (878 papers) and Social Psychology (770 papers) specifically the topics of Art Therapy and Mental Health (994 papers), Music Therapy and Health (585 papers) and Child Therapy and Development (469 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Arts in Psychotherapy are David Read Johnson, Michael J. Silverman, Dee Spring, Sabine C. Koch, Robert J. Landy, Rudolf Arnheim, David Aldridge, Jane Edwards, Iris Bräuninger and David E. Gussak.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Arts in Psychotherapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Arts in Psychotherapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Arts in Psychotherapy.

Countries where authors publish in The Arts in Psychotherapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Arts in Psychotherapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Arts in Psychotherapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Arts in Psychotherapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025