Karen Stenner
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Health Information Management top 1%
- Emergency Medical Services top 5%
- Emergency Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Molly CourtenayNicola CareyJeroen PetersSandra LawtonHeather GagePeter WilliamsFreda MoldJill Maben
- Topics
- Nursing Roles and Practices (30 papers)Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (11 papers)Primary Care and Health Outcomes (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Karen Stenner
40 papers receiving 752 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- General Health Professions 617
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 207
- Health Information Management 154
- Emergency Medical Services 98
- Emergency Medicine 92
Countries citing papers authored by Karen Stenner
This map shows the geographic impact of Karen Stenner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen Stenner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen Stenner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karen Stenner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen Stenner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen Stenner. The network helps show where Karen Stenner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen Stenner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen Stenner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen Stenner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen Stenner. Karen Stenner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 60 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | Does non-medical prescribing make a difference to patients? | 10 |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 85 | |
| 15 | 56 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 64 | |
| 20 | 46 |
About Karen Stenner
Karen Stenner is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Geriatrics and Gerontology and General Health Professions, having authored 45 papers that have together received 781 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Roles and Practices (30 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (11 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (154 citations), General Health Professions (617 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (84 citations). Karen Stenner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Molly Courtenay, Nicola Carey, Jeroen Peters, Sandra Lawton, Heather Gage, Peter Williams, Freda Mold, Jill Maben, Kirsty Winkley and Simon Otter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, British Journal of Dermatology and Diabetic Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.