Nicola Carey

2.2k total citations
87 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Nicola Carey is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Geriatrics and Gerontology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicola Carey has authored 87 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 57 papers in General Health Professions, 20 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 16 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology. Recurrent topics in Nicola Carey's work include Nursing Roles and Practices (44 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (13 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (11 papers). Nicola Carey is often cited by papers focused on Nursing Roles and Practices (44 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (13 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (11 papers). Nicola Carey collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Nicola Carey's co-authors include Molly Courtenay, Karen Stenner, Freda Mold, Tara Kidd, Jill Shawe, Jeroen Peters, Sandra Lawton, Märtha Sund‐Levander, Pia Tingström and Emma Ream and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Computer Physics Communications and Journal of Medical Internet Research.

In The Last Decade

Nicola Carey

79 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nicola Carey United Kingdom 24 955 339 233 202 145 87 1.5k
Tiffany A. Radcliff United States 21 502 0.5× 276 0.8× 147 0.6× 55 0.3× 115 0.8× 57 1.7k
Andrea Driscoll Australia 24 568 0.6× 172 0.5× 117 0.5× 52 0.3× 116 0.8× 120 2.0k
Michelle Myall United Kingdom 16 683 0.7× 342 1.0× 104 0.4× 75 0.4× 82 0.6× 36 1.2k
Kedar S. Mate United States 13 632 0.7× 250 0.7× 198 0.8× 65 0.3× 85 0.6× 33 1.1k
J. Lloyd Michener United States 15 1.1k 1.2× 536 1.6× 82 0.4× 98 0.5× 92 0.6× 36 1.9k
M P Eccles United Kingdom 14 851 0.9× 574 1.7× 129 0.6× 96 0.5× 46 0.3× 19 1.8k
Ellen T. Kurtzman United States 17 1.2k 1.3× 285 0.8× 185 0.8× 82 0.4× 210 1.4× 46 1.7k
Pierre Chopard Switzerland 21 449 0.5× 131 0.4× 105 0.5× 75 0.4× 164 1.1× 51 1.2k
Edwin S. Wong United States 20 896 0.9× 261 0.8× 79 0.3× 52 0.3× 81 0.6× 127 1.5k
Luís Andrés Gimeno-Feliú Spain 24 483 0.5× 151 0.4× 367 1.6× 77 0.4× 141 1.0× 53 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Nicola Carey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicola Carey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicola Carey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicola Carey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicola Carey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicola Carey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicola Carey. The network helps show where Nicola Carey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicola Carey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicola Carey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicola Carey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicola Carey. Nicola Carey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Beattie, Michelle, et al.. (2025). Exploring Care Home Workers' Perceptions of Implementing ECHO: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Older People Nursing. 20(2). e70017–e70017.
2.
Carey, Nicola, Danielle Dupuis, Elena Flores, et al.. (2025). Glaucoma Patient Perspectives on Effective Coaching for Self-Management. Journal of Glaucoma. 34(9). 719–727.
3.
Carey, Nicola, et al.. (2024). Therapeutic radiographer prescribing practices in the United Kingdom: Questionnaire survey. Radiography. 30(3). 964–970. 3 indexed citations
4.
Masot, Olga, et al.. (2023). Nurses' perceived barriers and facilitators to the implementation of nurse prescribing: Delphi study and focus group. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 80(5). 2106–2120. 3 indexed citations
5.
6.
Piano, Marianne, et al.. (2022). Having the conversation about vision for safe driving with older adults: an exploratory study of eyecare professional experiences in England and Australia. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 106(6). 666–674. 2 indexed citations
7.
Carey, Nicola, et al.. (2020). Exploratory study of clinician and patient views regarding the use of a preconception care app for women with diabetes. Health Informatics Journal. 26(4). 2673–2688. 6 indexed citations
8.
Stenner, Karen, Freda Mold, Simon Otter, et al.. (2018). Medicines management activity with physiotherapy and podiatry: A systematic mixed studies review. Health Policy. 122(12). 1333–1339. 9 indexed citations
9.
Carey, Nicola, et al.. (2016). P349. The effects of smoking on thiopurine metabolism. Journal of Crohn s and Colitis. 10(suppl 1). S271.2–S272. 1 indexed citations
10.
Carey, Nicola, et al.. (2016). Preconception Care Education for Women With Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Conventional and Digital Health Interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 18(11). e291–e291. 27 indexed citations
11.
Carey, Nicola, et al.. (2016). Evaluation of a formal care worker educational intervention on pressure ulceration in the community. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 26(17-18). 2614–2623. 6 indexed citations
12.
Carey, Nicola, Karen Stenner, & Molly Courtenay. (2014). An exploration of how nurse prescribing is being used for patients with respiratory conditions across the east of England. BMC Health Services Research. 14(1). 27–27. 33 indexed citations
13.
Stenner, Karen, Nicola Carey, & Molly Courtenay. (2012). Prescribing for pain – how do nurses contribute? A national questionnaire survey. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 21(23-24). 3335–3345. 12 indexed citations
14.
Carey, Nicola & Karen Stenner. (2011). Does non-medical prescribing make a difference to patients?. PubMed. 107(26). 14–6. 10 indexed citations
15.
Courtenay, Molly, Karen Stenner, & Nicola Carey. (2010). The views of patients with diabetes about nurse prescribing. Diabetic Medicine. 27(9). 1049–1054. 38 indexed citations
16.
Carey, Nicola & Molly Courtenay. (2009). Adopting the prescribing role in practice: exploring nurses’ views in a specialist children’s hospital. Paediatric Care. 21(9). 25–29. 7 indexed citations
17.
Carey, Nicola, et al.. (2008). The prescribing practices of nurse independent prescribers caring for patients with diabetes. Practical Diabetes International. 25(4). 152–157. 10 indexed citations
18.
Courtenay, Molly, et al.. (2007). An evaluation of a specialist nurse prescriber on diabetes in‐patient service delivery. Practical Diabetes International. 24(2). 69–74. 20 indexed citations
19.
Carey, Nicola & Molly Courtenay. (2007). A review of the activity and effects of nurse‐led care in diabetes. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 16(11c). 296–304. 56 indexed citations
20.
Courtenay, Molly, et al.. (2006). Independent extended supplementary nurse prescribers, their prescribing practice and confidence to educate and assess prescribing students. Nurse Education Today. 27(7). 739–747. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tiffany A. Radcliff Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrea Driscoll Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michelle Myall Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kedar S. Mate Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Lloyd Michener Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M P Eccles Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ellen T. Kurtzman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Pierre Chopard Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Edwin S. Wong Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Luís Andrés Gimeno-Feliú
Rankless by CCL
2026