Karen Peeraer
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.5%
- Ovarian function and disorders 18
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 18
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment 18
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 1%
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments 11
-
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy 25
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics 17
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility 16
- Immunology top 10%
- Reproductive System and Pregnancy 11
- Co-authors
- Thomas D’HoogheChristel MeulemanSophie DebrockCarla TomassettiCarl SpiessensDiane De NeubourgAmelie FassbenderJoris Vermeesch
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Karen Peeraer
64 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Reproductive Medicine 923
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 489
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 688
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 512
- Immunology 292
Countries citing papers authored by Karen Peeraer
This map shows the geographic impact of Karen Peeraer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen Peeraer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen Peeraer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karen Peeraer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen Peeraer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen Peeraer. The network helps show where Karen Peeraer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Karen Peeraer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 45 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 40 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 54 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 25 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 18 | Correlation between the number of follicular flushings, oocyte/embryo quality and pregnancy rate for IVF: a prospective study | 2007 | 1 |
| 19 | 2005 | 47 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 34 |
About Karen Peeraer
Karen Peeraer is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (25 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (18 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (18 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (18 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (17 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (16 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (11 papers) and Reproductive System and Pregnancy (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (923 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (489 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (688 citations). Karen Peeraer has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Thomas D’Hooghe, Christel Meuleman, Sophie Debrock, Carla Tomassetti, Carl Spiessens, Diane De Neubourg, Amelie Fassbender, Joris Vermeesch, Peter De Loecker and Cleophas Kyama. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Scientific Reports and Genome biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.