Kris Van Den Bogaert
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics top 10%
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Otorhinolaryngology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Joris VermeeschNathalie BrisonEric LegiusKoenraad DevriendtGuy Van CampLuc DehaspeThomy de RavelHilde Van Esch
- Topics
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (19 papers)Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (12 papers)Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Kris Van Den Bogaert
36 papers receiving 950 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 404
- Molecular Biology 322
- Genetics 269
- Cancer Research 191
- Otorhinolaryngology 162
Countries citing papers authored by Kris Van Den Bogaert
This map shows the geographic impact of Kris Van Den Bogaert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kris Van Den Bogaert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kris Van Den Bogaert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kris Van Den Bogaert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kris Van Den Bogaert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kris Van Den Bogaert. The network helps show where Kris Van Den Bogaert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kris Van Den Bogaert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kris Van Den Bogaert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kris Van Den Bogaert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kris Van Den Bogaert. Kris Van Den Bogaert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 39 | |
| 14 | 98 | |
| 15 | 44 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 145 | |
| 18 | 49 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 78 |
About Kris Van Den Bogaert
Kris Van Den Bogaert is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Sensory Systems and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 36 papers that have together received 998 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (19 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (12 papers) and Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (162 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (404 citations) and Sensory Systems (88 citations). Kris Van Den Bogaert has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Joris Vermeesch, Nathalie Brison, Eric Legius, Koenraad Devriendt, Guy Van Camp, Luc Dehaspe, Thomy de Ravel, Hilde Van Esch, Hilde Peeters and Paul Brady. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Scientific Reports and The American Journal of Human Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.