Rik van Eekelen

1.1k total citations
55 papers, 495 citations indexed

About

Rik van Eekelen is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Rik van Eekelen has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 495 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 23 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 19 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Rik van Eekelen's work include Ovarian function and disorders (21 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (21 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (14 papers). Rik van Eekelen is often cited by papers focused on Ovarian function and disorders (21 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (21 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (14 papers). Rik van Eekelen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and United Kingdom. Rik van Eekelen's co-authors include Ben W. Mol, Madelon van Wely, Marinus J.C. Eijkemans, David J. McLernon, Nan van Geloven, Fulco van der Veen, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Esmée M Bordewijk, Wentao Li and Monique H. Mochtar and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

In The Last Decade

Rik van Eekelen

51 papers receiving 491 citations

Peers

Rik van Eekelen
Tiina Sevón Finland
Jason D. Kofinas United States
Miriam Garland United States
M. Krishnan United Kingdom
Valerie Angus United Kingdom
Paula Bednarek United States
Ramesh Amatya United States
Wendy Vitek United States
Tiina Sevón Finland
Rik van Eekelen
Citations per year, relative to Rik van Eekelen Rik van Eekelen (= 1×) peers Tiina Sevón

Countries citing papers authored by Rik van Eekelen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rik van Eekelen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rik van Eekelen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rik van Eekelen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rik van Eekelen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rik van Eekelen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rik van Eekelen. The network helps show where Rik van Eekelen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rik van Eekelen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rik van Eekelen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rik van Eekelen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rik van Eekelen. Rik van Eekelen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vermeer, Sarah E., Patrick M. Bossuyt, Rik van Eekelen, et al.. (2025). Rationale and design of ‘StAtins in Frail oldEr patients with ischemic Stroke or Transient ischemic attack–the Randomized Controlled Trial’ (SAFEST-RCT). BMJ Neurology Open. 7(2). e001297–e001297.
2.
Bordewijk, Esmée M, Lyle C. Gurrin, M. Flanagan, et al.. (2025). Assessing the scientific integrity of the collected work of one author or author group. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 180. 111603–111603. 2 indexed citations
3.
Greuter, Marjolein J.E., Marloes A.G. Elferink, Rik van Eekelen, et al.. (2024). Cumulative Incidence, Risk Factors, and Overall Survival of Disease Recurrence after Curative Resection of Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer: A Population-based Study. Cancer Research Communications. 4(2). 607–616. 1 indexed citations
4.
Leeuwen, Elisabeth van, et al.. (2024). Psychological sequelae following second‐trimester termination of pregnancy: A longitudinal study. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 103(9). 1868–1876. 2 indexed citations
5.
Eekelen, Rik van, Sébastien Matamoros, Marjon A. de Boer, et al.. (2024). Vaginal microbiota and spontaneous preterm birth in pregnant women at high risk of recurrence. Heliyon. 10(10). e30685–e30685. 6 indexed citations
7.
Tu, Le Mai, John Heesakkers, Claudia R. Kowalik, et al.. (2023). Cost‐effectiveness of urethral bulking polydimethylsiloxane‐Urolastic® compared with mid‐urethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence: A two‐arm cohort study. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 130(6). 674–683. 1 indexed citations
8.
Mol, Ben W., Esmée M Bordewijk, Rik van Eekelen, et al.. (2023). Checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist): concept proposal and pilot. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8(1). 6–6. 53 indexed citations
9.
Eekelen, Rik van, Daphne N. Voormolen, Harold W. de Valk, et al.. (2023). Continuous glucose monitoring metrics and pregnancy outcomes in insulin‐treated diabetes: A post‐hoc analysis of the GlucoMOMS trial. Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism. 25(12). 3798–3806. 11 indexed citations
10.
Oudijk, Martijn A., et al.. (2023). Assessment of cervical softening and the prediction of preterm birth (STIPP): protocol for a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 13(11). e071597–e071597. 2 indexed citations
11.
Danhof, N A, Rik van Eekelen, Michael P. Diamond, et al.. (2022). Ovarian stimulation strategies for intrauterine insemination in couples with unexplained infertility: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update. 28(5). 733–746. 9 indexed citations
12.
Hoorn, Marie‐Louise van der, Rik van Eekelen, Nan van Geloven, et al.. (2022). Development of the OPAL prediction model for prediction of live birth in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss: protocol for a prospective and retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands. BMJ Open. 12(9). e062402–e062402. 1 indexed citations
13.
Mijatovic, Velja, et al.. (2022). The effect of myomectomy on reproductive outcomes in patients with uterine fibroids: A retrospective cohort study. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 45(5). 970–978. 9 indexed citations
14.
Wang, Zheng, Astrid EP Cantineau, Annemieke Hoek, et al.. (2022). Live birth is not the only relevant outcome in research assessing assisted reproductive technology. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 86. 102306–102306. 3 indexed citations
16.
Bordewijk, Esmée M, Wentao Li, Rik van Eekelen, et al.. (2021). Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 136. 189–202. 33 indexed citations
17.
Carosso, Andrea Roberto, Rik van Eekelen, Alberto Revelli, et al.. (2021). Expectant Management Before In vitro Fertilization in Women Aged 39 or Above and Unexplained Infertility Does Not Decrease Live Birth Rates Compared to Immediate Treatment. Reproductive Sciences. 29(4). 1232–1240. 3 indexed citations
18.
Wang, Rui, Rik van Eekelen, Monique H. Mochtar, Femke Mol, & Madelon van Wely. (2020). Treatment Strategies for Unexplained Infertility. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. 38(1). 48–54. 4 indexed citations
20.
ElMokhallalati, Yousuf, Rik van Eekelen, Siladitya Bhattacharya, & David J. McLernon. (2019). Treatment-independent live birth after in-vitro fertilisation: a retrospective cohort study of 2,133 women. Human Reproduction. 34(8). 1470–1478. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026