Eline Dancet
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 1%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Demography top 2%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Thomas D’HoogheW. L. D. M. NelenJan A.M. KremerWalter SermeusSjoerd ReppingFulco van der VeenI. W. H. van EmpelSaskia Hendriks
- Topics
- Reproductive Health and Technologies (45 papers)Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (29 papers)Ovarian function and disorders (21 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Eline Dancet
63 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Reproductive Medicine 1.3k
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 767
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 517
- Demography 226
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 224
Countries citing papers authored by Eline Dancet
This map shows the geographic impact of Eline Dancet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eline Dancet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eline Dancet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eline Dancet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eline Dancet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eline Dancet. The network helps show where Eline Dancet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eline Dancet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eline Dancet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eline Dancet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eline Dancet. Eline Dancet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 52 | |
| 16 | 60 | |
| 17 | O-160 the voice of Dutch women with anticipated gamete exhaustion who consider oocyte freezing to increase their chances on shared parenthood | 4 |
| 18 | 60 | |
| 19 | 97 | |
| 20 | 195 |
About Eline Dancet
Eline Dancet is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (45 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (29 papers) and Ovarian function and disorders (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (1.3k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (767 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (224 citations). Eline Dancet has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas D’Hooghe, W. L. D. M. Nelen, Jan A.M. Kremer, Walter Sermeus, Sjoerd Repping, Fulco van der Veen, I. W. H. van Empel, Saskia Hendriks, Thomas D’Hooghe and Silke Apers. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Human Reproduction and Fertility and Sterility.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.