Ben J Cohlen

4.3k total citations
65 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Ben J Cohlen is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Ben J Cohlen has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 56 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 34 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 33 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Ben J Cohlen's work include Ovarian function and disorders (44 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (33 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (30 papers). Ben J Cohlen is often cited by papers focused on Ovarian function and disorders (44 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (33 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (30 papers). Ben J Cohlen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Ben J Cohlen's co-authors include Astrid EP Cantineau, Maas Jan Heineman, E.R. Groenewoud, Nick Macklon, Susanne M. Veltman-Verhulst, Edward G. Hughes, Boudewijn J. Kollen, Cindy Farquhar, Carolien M. Boomsma and Joop S.E. Laven and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Ben J Cohlen

64 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Ben J Cohlen
Jolande A. Land Netherlands
Ben J Cohlen
Citations per year, relative to Ben J Cohlen Ben J Cohlen (= 1×) peers Jolande A. Land

Countries citing papers authored by Ben J Cohlen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben J Cohlen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben J Cohlen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben J Cohlen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben J Cohlen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben J Cohlen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben J Cohlen. The network helps show where Ben J Cohlen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ben J Cohlen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ben J Cohlen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ben J Cohlen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ben J Cohlen. Ben J Cohlen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Cohlen, Ben J, Els Slappendel, B.C. Schoot, et al.. (2023). A multicentre double-blinded randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of laser-assisted hatching in patients with repeated implantation failure undergoing IVF or ICSI. Human Reproduction. 38(10). 1952–1960. 2 indexed citations
3.
Danhof, N A, Rik van Eekelen, Michael P. Diamond, et al.. (2022). Ovarian stimulation strategies for intrauterine insemination in couples with unexplained infertility: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update. 28(5). 733–746. 9 indexed citations
4.
Zaat, Tjitske R., Mariëtte Goddijn, Frank J. Broekmans, et al.. (2021). Increased obstetric and neonatal risks in artificial cycles for frozen embryo transfers?. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 42(5). 919–929. 36 indexed citations
5.
Koedooder, Rivka, Martin Singer, Sam Schoenmakers, et al.. (2019). The Vaginal Microbiome as a Predictor for Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization With or Without Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: A Prospective Study. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 74(10). 596–597. 3 indexed citations
6.
Wely, Madelon van, Annemiek Nap, Ben W. Mol, et al.. (2019). The AID study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial of intrauterine insemination in the natural cycle compared with intracervical insemination in the natural cycle. BMJ Open. 9(7). e026065–e026065. 4 indexed citations
7.
Groenewoud, E.R., Astrid EP Cantineau, Boudewijn J. Kollen, Nick Macklon, & Ben J Cohlen. (2017). What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update. 49 indexed citations
8.
Aarts, Johanna W. M., Anne M. van Oers, Marjan J. Faber, et al.. (2015). Communication at an online infertility expert forum: provider responses to patients’ emotional and informational cues. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. 36(2). 66–74. 7 indexed citations
9.
Aarts, Johanna W. M., et al.. (2015). Lessons learned from the implementation of an online infertility community into an IVF clinic's daily practice. Human Fertility. 18(4). 238–247. 14 indexed citations
10.
Voorhuis, Marlies, N. Charlotte Onland‐Moret, Hans Kristian Ploos van Amstel, et al.. (2014). The significance of fragile X mental retardation gene 1 CGG repeat sizes in the normal and intermediate range in women with primary ovarian insufficiency. Human Reproduction. 29(7). 1585–1593. 28 indexed citations
12.
Broekmans, F. J., Marinus J.C. Eijkemans, Ben J Cohlen, et al.. (2012). Does initiation of GnRH antagonists on cycle day 2 result in a more favourable follicular phase endocrine profile compared to initiation on cycle day 6. Human Reproduction. 27. 1 indexed citations
13.
Groenewoud, E.R., Nick Macklon, & Ben J Cohlen. (2012). Cryo-thawed embryo transfer: natural versus artificial cycle. A non-inferiority trial.(ANTARCTICA trial). BMC Women s Health. 12(1). 27–27. 32 indexed citations
14.
15.
Leeuwen, Flora E. van, Helen Klip, Thea M. Mooij, et al.. (2011). Risk of borderline and invasive ovarian tumours after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization in a large Dutch cohort. Human Reproduction. 26(12). 3456–3465. 118 indexed citations
16.
Groenewoud, E.R., Boudewijn J. Kollen, N.S. Macklon, & Ben J Cohlen. (2011). Spontaneous LH surges prior to HCG administration in unstimulated-cycle frozen–thawed embryo transfer do not influence pregnancy rates. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 24(2). 191–196. 25 indexed citations
17.
Empel, I. W. H. van, Johanna W. M. Aarts, Ben J Cohlen, et al.. (2010). Measuring patient-centredness, the neglected outcome in fertility care: a random multicentre validation study. Human Reproduction. 25(10). 2516–2526. 90 indexed citations
18.
Kremer, J.A.M., Ben J Cohlen, C.J.C.M. Hamilton, et al.. (2006). A randomized clinical trial of clomiphene citrate versus low dose recombinant FSH for ovarian hyperstimulation in intrauterine insemination cycles for unexplained and male subfertility. Human Reproduction. 22(3). 792–797. 58 indexed citations
19.
Kwee, Anneke, Ben J Cohlen, Humphrey H.H. Kanhai, Hein W. Bruinse, & Gerard H.A. Visser. (2004). Caesarean section on request: a survey in The Netherlands. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 113(2). 186–190. 50 indexed citations
20.
Cantineau, Astrid EP, M.J. Heineman, Hesham Al-Inany, & Ben J Cohlen. (2004). Intrauterine insemination versus Fallopian tube sperm perfusion in non-tubal subfertility: a systematic review based on a Cochrane review*. Human Reproduction. 19(12). 2721–2729. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026