Kar Ho Lim

470 citations
21 papers · 381 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Kar Ho Lim

18 papers receiving 356 citations

Peers

Kar Ho Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 53
  • Marketing 138
  • Food Science 124
  • Economics and Econometrics 175
  • General Decision Sciences 11
Replace Rodolfo M. Nayga with:
Rodolfo M. Nayga United States
Claudia Bazzani Italy
Pascale Bazoche France
Eliza M. Mojduszka United States
Susan Hine United States
Dian Zhu China
Leigh J. Maynard United States
Caterina Romano Italy
Irina Dolgopolova Germany
Meike Guenther New Zealand
Kar Ho Lim relative to Rodolfo M. Nayga United States Rodolfo M. Nayga's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Rodolfo M. Nayga · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kar Ho Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kar Ho Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kar Ho Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kar Ho Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kar Ho Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kar Ho Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kar Ho Lim. The network helps show where Kar Ho Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Kar Ho Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kar Ho Lim Line = papers co-authored together Kar Ho Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012119
2 201368
3 201548
4 201844
5 201925
6 201824
7 20169
8 20228
9 20188
10 20207
11
How local is local? Consumer Preference for Steaks with Different Food Mile Implications
20136
12 20203
13 20242
14
Willingness to Pay for Country-of-origin Labeled, Traceable, and BSE-tested Beef
20122
15 20122
16 20192
17 20251
18 20111
19 20121
20 20151

About Kar Ho Lim

Kar Ho Lim is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Plant Science, Marketing, Ecology and Food Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (17 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (15 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (5 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (3 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (3 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (2 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (2 papers) and Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (53 citations), Marketing (138 citations), Food Science (124 citations), Economics and Econometrics (175 citations) and General Decision Sciences (11 citations). Kar Ho Lim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and China. Frequent co-authors include Wuyang Hu, Leigh J. Maynard, Ellen Goddard, Rodolfo M. Nayga, Michael R. Reed, Jahangir Khan, Aditya R. Khanal, Wei Yang, Ghaffar Ali and Michael Öllinger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cleaner Production, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie, Agribusiness, Journal of agricultural and resource economics and Sustainability.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact