K. Gilvarry
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Philosophy top 5%
- Mental Health and Psychiatry
Papers in
-
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 6
-
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 2
- Co-authors
- Robin Murray (9 shared papers)Peter B. Jones (8 shared papers)Pak C. Sham (6 shared papers)Jim van Os (4 shared papers)Brian Toone (5 shared papers)Paul Bebbington (4 shared papers)Shôn Lewis (4 shared papers)Ailsa Russell (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (5 papers)Schizophrenia Research (4 papers)European Psychiatry (1 paper)Psychological Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
K. Gilvarry
11 papers receiving 351 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Psychiatry and Mental health 285
- Philosophy 80
- Clinical Psychology 140
- Biological Psychiatry 8
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 39
Countries citing papers authored by K. Gilvarry
This map shows the geographic impact of K. Gilvarry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Gilvarry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Gilvarry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K. Gilvarry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Gilvarry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Gilvarry. The network helps show where K. Gilvarry may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside K. Gilvarry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 101 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 81 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 68 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 61 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 39 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 1 |
About K. Gilvarry
K. Gilvarry is a scholar working on Philosophy, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Genetics and Social Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 388 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (1 paper) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (285 citations), Philosophy (80 citations), Clinical Psychology (140 citations), Biological Psychiatry (8 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (39 citations). K. Gilvarry has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Robin Murray, Peter B. Jones, Pak C. Sham, Jim van Os, Brian Toone, Paul Bebbington, Shôn Lewis, Ailsa Russell, Hélène Verdoux and Machteld Marcelis. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Research, European Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.