Daniel W. Van Ness
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Law top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Education
- Co-authors
- Karen Heetderks StrongStephen J. Farenga
- Topics
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers)Law in Society and Culture (3 papers)Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work Social ThoughtCriminal Law ForumMedical Entomology and Zoology
- Partner nations
- MaltaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Daniel W. Van Ness
12 papers receiving 310 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Sociology and Political Science 259
- Clinical Psychology 131
- Law 79
- Political Science and International Relations 44
- Education 41
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel W. Van Ness
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel W. Van Ness's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel W. Van Ness with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel W. Van Ness more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel W. Van Ness
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel W. Van Ness. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel W. Van Ness. The network helps show where Daniel W. Van Ness may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel W. Van Ness
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel W. Van Ness. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel W. Van Ness based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel W. Van Ness. Daniel W. Van Ness is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | Blocks, Bricks, and Planks: Relationships between Affordance and Visuo-Spatial Constructive Play Objects. | 20 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | AN OVERVIEW OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AROUND THE WORLD | 13 |
| 5 | 38 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | Restorative Justice Policies & Programs | 1 |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 180 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 52 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | Crime and its victims | 15 |
About Daniel W. Van Ness
Daniel W. Van Ness is a scholar working on Law, Conservation and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers), Law in Society and Culture (3 papers) and Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (79 citations), Clinical Psychology (131 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (259 citations). Daniel W. Van Ness has collaborated with scholars based in Malta and United States. Frequent co-authors include Karen Heetderks Strong and Stephen J. Farenga. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work Social Thought, Criminal Law Forum and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.