Adam Feltz
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Edward T. CokelyThomas NadelhofferEric SchulzJoshua MayFlorián CovaRichard ScheinesJustin SytsmaÉdouard Machery
- Topics
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (35 papers)Free Will and Agency (17 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaWater ResearchBioScience
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyIreland
In The Last Decade
Adam Feltz
59 papers receiving 890 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Cognitive Neuroscience 697
- Philosophy 378
- Sociology and Political Science 197
- Social Psychology 189
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 95
Countries citing papers authored by Adam Feltz
This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Feltz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Feltz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Feltz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Feltz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Feltz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Feltz. The network helps show where Adam Feltz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam Feltz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam Feltz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam Feltz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam Feltz. Adam Feltz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | Training Graph Literacy: Developing the RiskLiteracy.org Outreach Platform. | 1 |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | Questioning the free will comprehension question. | 3 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 86 | |
| 19 | An Anomaly in Intentional Action Ascription: More Evidence of Folk Diversity | 8 |
| 20 | The Knobe effect: A brief overview. | 31 |
About Adam Feltz
Adam Feltz is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy, having authored 64 papers that have together received 969 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (35 papers), Free Will and Agency (17 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (697 citations), Philosophy (378 citations) and General Decision Sciences (51 citations). Adam Feltz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Edward T. Cokely, Thomas Nadelhoffer, Eric Schulz, Joshua May, Florián Cova, Richard Scheines, Justin Sytsma, Édouard Machery, Jonathan Livengood and Alejandro Pérez. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Water Research and BioScience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.