John Schwenkler

720 total citations
27 papers, 236 citations indexed

About

John Schwenkler is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, John Schwenkler has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 236 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 13 papers in Philosophy and 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in John Schwenkler's work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). John Schwenkler is often cited by papers focused on Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). John Schwenkler collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Israel. John Schwenkler's co-authors include Berislav Marušić, Robert Briscoe, Justin Sytsma, Eric Marcus and Robert H. Bishop and has published in prestigious journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Cognitive Science and Noûs.

In The Last Decade

John Schwenkler

25 papers receiving 214 citations

Peers

John Schwenkler
Susanna Siegel United States
Dustin Stokes United States
Zoe Drayson United States
Craig French United Kingdom
Michelle Montague United States
Tom McClelland United Kingdom
Pete Mandik United States
Adam Pautz United States
Susanna Siegel United States
John Schwenkler
Citations per year, relative to John Schwenkler John Schwenkler (= 1×) peers Susanna Siegel

Countries citing papers authored by John Schwenkler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Schwenkler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Schwenkler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Schwenkler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Schwenkler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Schwenkler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Schwenkler. The network helps show where John Schwenkler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Schwenkler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Schwenkler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Schwenkler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Schwenkler. John Schwenkler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schwenkler, John. (2024). How Temptation Works. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy. 27(3). 1 indexed citations
2.
Schwenkler, John. (2023). The categories of causation. Synthese. 203(1). 1 indexed citations
3.
Sytsma, Justin, Robert H. Bishop, & John Schwenkler. (2022). Has the side-effect effect been cancelled? (No, not yet.). Synthese. 200(5).
4.
Schwenkler, John. (2021). Intention as Belief. Pacific philosophical quarterly. 103(2). 318–334. 1 indexed citations
5.
Schwenkler, John, et al.. (2021). One: but not the same. Philosophical Studies. 179(6). 1939–1951. 3 indexed citations
6.
Schwenkler, John & Justin Sytsma. (2020). Reversing the Norm Effect on Causal Attributions. PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh). 3 indexed citations
7.
Schwenkler, John. (2019). Anscombe's Intention. Oxford University Press eBooks. 23 indexed citations
8.
Marušić, Berislav & John Schwenkler. (2018). Intending is Believing: A Defense of Strong Cognitivism. Analytic Philosophy. 59(3). 309–340. 35 indexed citations
9.
Schwenkler, John. (2018). Self-Knowledge and Its Limits. Journal of Moral Philosophy. 15(1). 85–95. 3 indexed citations
10.
Schwenkler, John, et al.. (2018). Are perspectival shapes seen or imagined? An experimental approach. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 18(5). 855–877. 3 indexed citations
11.
Marcus, Eric & John Schwenkler. (2018). Assertion and transparent self-knowledge. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 49(7). 873–889. 2 indexed citations
12.
Schwenkler, John. (2015). Understanding 'Practical Knowledge'. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 15(15). 19 indexed citations
13.
Schwenkler, John. (2015). Commentary: “Multimodal Theories of Recognition and Their Relation to Molyneux's Question”. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 1792–1792. 3 indexed citations
14.
Briscoe, Robert & John Schwenkler. (2015). Conscious Vision in Action. Cognitive Science. 39(7). 1435–1467. 32 indexed citations
15.
Schwenkler, John. (2013). Immunity to Error through Misidentification * Edited by SIMON PROSSER and FRANCOIS RECANATI. Analysis. 73(1). 180–182. 1 indexed citations
16.
Schwenkler, John. (2012). Objectivity and the Parochial. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly. 86(1). 173–175. 3 indexed citations
17.
Schwenkler, John. (2012). Does Visual Spatial Awareness Require the Visual Awareness of Space?. Mind & Language. 27(3). 308–329. 11 indexed citations
18.
Schwenkler, John. (2012). Do things look the way they feel?. Analysis. 73(1). 86–96. 15 indexed citations
19.
Schwenkler, John. (2011). Perception and practical knowledge. Philosophical Explorations. 14(2). 137–152. 11 indexed citations
20.
Schwenkler, John. (2011). The objects of bodily awareness. Philosophical Studies. 162(2). 465–472. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026