Jun Wu

3.5k citations
148 papers · 2.8k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

    • Phytochemical compounds biological activities 61
    • Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 7
    • Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae 35

Jun Wu

136 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Jun Wu
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Horticulture 178
  • Biotechnology 595
  • Biochemistry 453
  • Pharmacology 596
  • Pharmacology 259
Replace Jong Keun Son with:
Jong Keun Son South Korea
Keiji Hasumi Japan
Mei‐Chin Lu Taiwan
Fanny Roussi France
Chung‐Hsiung Chen Taiwan
Shunji Aoki Japan
Kazuyoshi Kawazoe Japan
Ying Zeng China
Dong Xiao China
Jinshan Tang China
Jun Wu relative to Jong Keun Son South Korea Jong Keun Son's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.5×
Jong Keun Son · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jun Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jun Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jun Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jun Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jun Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jun Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jun Wu. The network helps show where Jun Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jun Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jun Wu Line = papers co-authored together Jun Wu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 148 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008235
2 1996129
3 1996123
4 2009105
5 200995
6 200777
7 200571
8 200470
9 201862
10 202251
11 201050
12 200747
13 201344
14 200343
15 200941
16 201040
17 201538
18 201236
19 200935
20 201635

About Jun Wu

Jun Wu is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Biotechnology, Organic Chemistry and Horticulture, having authored 148 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemical compounds biological activities (61 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (35 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (32 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (20 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (16 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (7 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (7 papers) and Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (178 citations), Biotechnology (595 citations), Biochemistry (453 citations), Pharmacology (596 citations) and Pharmacology (259 citations). Jun Wu has collaborated with scholars based in China, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Qiang Xiao, Min‐Yi Li, Li Shen, Jianyu Pan, Jing Xu, Tirumani Satyanandamurty, Si Zhang, Qingxin Li, Gerhard Bringmann and Meihua Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Fitoterapia, Journal of Natural Products, Marine Drugs, Journal of Asian Natural Products Research and Organic Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact