Journal of Natural Products

15.2k papers and 478.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 15.2k papers published in Journal of Natural Products in the last decades have received a total of 478.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Natural Products usually cover Molecular Biology (7.5k papers), Pharmacology (4.3k papers) and Plant Science (3.6k papers) specifically the topics of Marine Sponges and Natural Products (3.0k papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (2.9k papers) and Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (2.9k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Natural Products are Gordon M. Cragg, David Newman, Piergiorgio Pietta, David G. I. Kingston, William H. Gerwick, Kenneth M. Snader, A. A. Leslie Gunatilaka, Mark S. Butler, A. Douglas Kinghorn and Jerry L. McLaughlin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Natural Products

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Natural Products. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Natural Products.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Natural Products

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Natural Products. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Natural Products with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Natural Products more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025