Peter Proksch
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 0.01%
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products
- Pharmacology top 0.01%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
- Fungal Biology and Applications
Papers in
- Pharmacology 317
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 299
- Fungal Biology and Applications 132
- Biotechnology 269
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products 253
- Co-authors
- Wenhan Lin (196 shared papers)Victor Wray (133 shared papers)Amal H. Aly (44 shared papers)Abdessamad Debbab (44 shared papers)RuAngelie Edrada‐Ebel (71 shared papers)Rainer Ebel (61 shared papers)Wernér E.G. Müller (82 shared papers)Julia Kjer (8 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Peter Proksch
617 papers receiving 19.7k citations
Peter Proksch's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
- Biotechnology 7.0k
- Pharmacology 9.8k
- Toxicology 588
- Cell Biology 2.3k
- Organic Chemistry 4.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Proksch
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Proksch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Proksch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Proksch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Proksch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Proksch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Proksch. The network helps show where Peter Proksch may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Proksch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 627 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fungal endophytes: unique plant inhabitants with great promises Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 472 |
| 2 | 2010 | 461 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 377 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 269 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 262 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 229 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 207 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 207 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 178 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 170 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 168 | |
| 12 | 1983 | 152 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 141 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 141 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 138 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 137 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 133 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 132 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 132 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 130 |
About Peter Proksch
Peter Proksch is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Biotechnology, Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry and Plant Science, having authored 627 papers that have together received 20.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (299 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (253 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (132 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (65 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (59 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (55 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (52 papers) and Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (52 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (7.0k citations), Pharmacology (9.8k citations), Toxicology (588 citations), Cell Biology (2.3k citations) and Organic Chemistry (4.1k citations). Peter Proksch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Wenhan Lin, Victor Wray, Amal H. Aly, Abdessamad Debbab, RuAngelie Edrada‐Ebel, Rainer Ebel, Wernér E.G. Müller, Julia Kjer, Bin‐Gui Wang and Sherif S. Ebada. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Phytochemistry, Planta Medica, Tetrahedron Letters and Marine Drugs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.