Louise Smith
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 0.05%
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Modeling and Simulation top 0.1%
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Papers in
-
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies 18
- Health 27
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy 22
- Co-authors
- Rebecca WebsterLisa WoodlandSamantha K. BrooksSimon WesselyNeil GreenbergGideon James RubinG. James RubinRichard Amlôt
- Journals
- Public Health (12 papers)PLoS ONE (9 papers)BMJ Open (7 papers)BMC Public Health (5 papers)Vaccine (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Louise Smith
99 papers receiving 12.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 188
- Clinical Psychology 8.6k
- Modeling and Simulation 1.2k
- Health 2.1k
- Applied Psychology 1.2k
- Social Psychology 2.6k
Countries citing papers authored by Louise Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Louise Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louise Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louise Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Louise Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louise Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louise Smith. The network helps show where Louise Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Louise Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 42 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 18 | COVID-19 vaccination intention in the UK: results from the COVID-19 vaccination acceptability study (CoVAccS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 536 |
| 19 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 20 | School Travel Plans: How Successful Are They? | 2010 | 1 |
About Louise Smith
Louise Smith is a scholar working on Modeling and Simulation, Health, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Research and Theory, having authored 108 papers that have together received 13.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 and Mental Health (45 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (22 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (18 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (11 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (8 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers) and Infection Control and Ventilation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (8.6k citations), Modeling and Simulation (1.2k citations), Health (2.1k citations), Applied Psychology (1.2k citations) and Social Psychology (2.6k citations). Louise Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Webster, Lisa Woodland, Samantha K. Brooks, Simon Wessely, Neil Greenberg, Gideon James Rubin, G. James Rubin, Richard Amlôt, John Weinman and Jenny Yiend. Their work appears in journals such as Public Health, PLoS ONE, BMJ Open, BMC Public Health and Vaccine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.