Sarah Knight

1.6k total citations
34 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Sarah Knight is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Knight has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 11 papers in Social Psychology and 10 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Sarah Knight's work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (10 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (7 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (6 papers). Sarah Knight is often cited by papers focused on Human-Animal Interaction Studies (10 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (7 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (6 papers). Sarah Knight collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Sarah Knight's co-authors include Aldert Vrij, Julie Cherryman, Karl Nunkoosing, Louise K. Barnett, Lucy Akehurst, Kim A. Bard, Paul Morris, Harold Herzog, David Keatley and Heather T. Rowan‐Kenyon and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Social Issues.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Knight

30 papers receiving 933 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sarah Knight United Kingdom	14	494	443	280	204	198	34	1.0k
Tania Signal Australia	19	760 1.5×	439 1.0×	286 1.0×	167 0.8×	231 1.2×	73	1.3k
Tiffani J. Howell Australia	21	932 1.9×	349 0.8×	431 1.5×	113 0.6×	154 0.8×	99	1.6k
Emma Otta Brazil	19	259 0.5×	384 0.9×	127 0.5×	204 1.0×	208 1.1×	96	1.4k
Deborah M. Custance United Kingdom	12	515 1.0×	615 1.4×	137 0.5×	95 0.5×	114 0.6×	16	1.0k
Harold Herzog United States	14	723 1.5×	241 0.5×	303 1.1×	93 0.5×	120 0.6×	67	1.0k
Sandra McCune United States	20	1.2k 2.5×	341 0.8×	448 1.6×	80 0.4×	151 0.8×	37	1.5k
Kerstin Meints United Kingdom	19	766 1.6×	378 0.9×	176 0.6×	48 0.2×	408 2.1×	43	1.5k
Andrea Beetz Germany	19	1.2k 2.5×	558 1.3×	293 1.0×	77 0.4×	149 0.8×	40	1.6k
Aline H. Kidd United States	20	794 1.6×	403 0.9×	174 0.6×	205 1.0×	193 1.0×	60	1.3k
Alexandra Horowitz United States	18	557 1.1×	284 0.6×	221 0.8×	78 0.4×	152 0.8×	41	965

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Knight

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Knight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Knight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Knight more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Knight

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Knight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Knight. The network helps show where Sarah Knight may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Knight

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Knight. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Knight based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Knight. Sarah Knight is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Hadlington, Lee, et al.. (2024). Public perceptions of the use of artificial intelligence in Defence: a qualitative exploration. AI & Society. 40(2). 277–290. 9 indexed citations

Hadlington, Lee, Jens Binder, Sarah Gardner, Maria Karanika‐Murray, & Sarah Knight. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence in a military context: development of the attitudes toward AI in defense (AAID) scale. Frontiers in Psychology. 14. 1164810–1164810. 14 indexed citations

Knight, Sarah, et al.. (2023). The age of extremism: a crime script analysis of violent and nonviolent extremists according to age of first extremist act. Journal of Criminal Psychology. 14(2). 157–179.

Knight, Sarah. (2021). Life of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Gorgias Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations

Keatley, David, et al.. (2021). A Crime Script Analysis of Violent and Nonviolent Extremists. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. 46(11). 2285–2302. 3 indexed citations

Knight, Sarah & David Keatley. (2019). How can the literature inform counter-terrorism practice? Recent advances and remaining challenges. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression. 12(3). 217–230. 5 indexed citations

Knight, Sarah. (2019). Narratives of religious identity: the self-perception of the Jacobite Syrian Christians of Kerala. SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London).

Knight, Sarah, et al.. (2017). Violent versus nonviolent actors: An empirical study of different types of extremism.. 4(4). 230–248. 32 indexed citations

Nichols, John, et al.. (2014). John Nichols's The progresses and public processions of Queen Elizabeth I : a new edition of the early modern sources. Oxford University Press eBooks. 2 indexed citations

10.

Morris, Paul, et al.. (2012). Belief in Animal Mind: Does Familiarity with Animals Influence Beliefs about Animal Emotions?. Society and Animals. 20(3). 211–224. 78 indexed citations

11.

Knight, Sarah. (2011). John Milton:Complete Shorter Poems – Edited by Stella P. Revard. Milton Quarterly. 45(4). 278–281. 1 indexed citations

12.

Knight, Sarah, et al.. (2010). The Intellectual and Cultural World of the Early Modern Inns of Court. Manchester University Press eBooks. 18 indexed citations

13.

Knight, Sarah. (2010). Milton's Student Verses of 1629. Notes and Queries. 57(1). 37–39. 1 indexed citations

14.

Bard, Kim A., et al.. (2010). Human Rights, Animal Wrongs? Exploring Attitudes toward Animal Use and Possibilities for Change. Society and Animals. 18(3). 251–272. 26 indexed citations

15.

Knight, Sarah & Harold Herzog. (2009). New perspectives on human-animal interactions : theory, policy, and research. Wiley-Blackwell eBooks. 1 indexed citations

16.

Knight, Sarah & Harold Herzog. (2009). All Creatures Great and Small: New Perspectives on Psychology and Human–Animal Interactions. Journal of Social Issues. 65(3). 451–461. 38 indexed citations

17.

Vrij, Aldert, Lucy Akehurst, & Sarah Knight. (2006). Police officers', social workers', teachers' and the general public's beliefs about deception in children, adolescents and adults. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 11(2). 297–312. 112 indexed citations

18.

Knight, Sarah, Aldert Vrij, Julie Cherryman, & Karl Nunkoosing. (2004). Attitudes towards animal use and belief in animal mind. Anthrozoös. 17(1). 43–62. 193 indexed citations

19.

Vrij, Aldert, Karl Nunkoosing, Sarah Knight, & Julie Cherryman. (2003). Using Grounded Theory to Examine People's Attitudes Toward How Animals are Used. Society and Animals. 11(4). 307–327. 79 indexed citations

20.

White, Michael & Sarah Knight. (2003). ITLOS and the 'Volga' case: The Russian federation v Australia. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 17. 39–53. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact