Julia M. Hofstra
- Nephrology top 0.2%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Immunology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jack F.M. WetzelsJan A.J.G. van den BrandPaul BrenchleyDavid J. SalantLaurence H. BeckPeter R. van DijkJohan van der VlagAnneke Bech
- Topics
- Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (27 papers)Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (11 papers)Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Julia M. Hofstra
34 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Nephrology 1.7k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 784
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 701
- Molecular Biology 429
- Immunology 424
Countries citing papers authored by Julia M. Hofstra
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia M. Hofstra's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia M. Hofstra with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia M. Hofstra more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia M. Hofstra
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia M. Hofstra. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia M. Hofstra. The network helps show where Julia M. Hofstra may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia M. Hofstra
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia M. Hofstra. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia M. Hofstra based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia M. Hofstra. Julia M. Hofstra is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | 196 | |
| 4 | 131 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 76 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 139 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 101 | |
| 11 | 76 | |
| 12 | Anti-PLA₂R antibodies in membranous nephropathy: ready for routine clinical practice? | 45 |
| 13 | 41 | |
| 14 | 62 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 48 | |
| 17 | Oscillometric blood pressure measurements: differences between measured and calculated mean arterial pressure. | 33 |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 36 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Julia M. Hofstra
Julia M. Hofstra is a scholar working on Nephrology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Genetics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (27 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (11 papers) and Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (1.7k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (701 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (784 citations). Julia M. Hofstra has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jack F.M. Wetzels, Jan A.J.G. van den Brand, Paul Brenchley, David J. Salant, Laurence H. Beck, Peter R. van Dijk, Johan van der Vlag, Anneke Bech, Elmar Pieterse and Peter W. Mathieson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Kidney International and Journal of the American Society of Nephrology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.