Lies H. Hoefsloot

12.2k citations
136 papers · 6.6k indexed · h-index 45

Lies H. Hoefsloot

132 papers receiving 6.5k citations

Peers

Lies H. Hoefsloot
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Sensory Systems 909
  • Genetics 1.1k
  • Genetics 1.7k
  • Otorhinolaryngology 268
  • Ophthalmology 543
Replace Mireille Claustres with:
Mireille Claustres France
William Reardon United Kingdom
Mustafa Tekin United States
Gudrun Nürnberg Germany
Leopoldo Zelante Italy
Michel Goossens France
Josseline Kaplan France
Tom Walsh United States
Michael B. Petersen Greece
Anne‐Françoise Roux France
Lies H. Hoefsloot relative to Mireille Claustres France Mireille Claustres's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Mireille Claustres · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lies H. Hoefsloot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lies H. Hoefsloot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lies H. Hoefsloot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lies H. Hoefsloot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lies H. Hoefsloot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lies H. Hoefsloot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lies H. Hoefsloot. The network helps show where Lies H. Hoefsloot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lies H. Hoefsloot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lies H. Hoefsloot Line = papers co-authored together Lies H. Hoefsloot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20236
3 20229
4
Diagnostic exome sequencing in 50 patients with high myopia
20201
5 202013
6 20198
7 20131
8 201336
9 201340
10 2012150
11 201250
12
Ten years of EAA/EMQN quality control scheme for microdeletions of the Y chromosome
20121
13 20122
14 201272
15 201110
16 201050
17 201057
18 2004113
19 200331
20
[From gene to disease: from the ABCA4 gene to Stargardt disease, cone-rod dystrophy and retinitis pigmentosa].
20023

About Lies H. Hoefsloot

Lies H. Hoefsloot is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Genetics and Ophthalmology, having authored 136 papers that have together received 6.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (31 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (22 papers), Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies (21 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (12 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (11 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (11 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (10 papers) and Congenital heart defects research (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (909 citations), Genetics (1.1k citations) and Genetics (1.7k citations). Lies H. Hoefsloot has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Frans P.M. Cremers, Hannie Kremer, Cor W. R. J. Cremers, Jorieke E. H. Bergman, Conny M.A. van Ravenswaaij‐Arts, Ivo P. Touw, Bob Löwenberg, Csilla Krausz, Manuela Simoni and Frank Tüttelmann. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nucleic Acids Research and Nature Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026