Julia Ching
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Cultural Studies top 1%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Religious studies top 2%
- Co-authors
- Hans KüngWilliam Theodore De BaryNorman J. GirardotHoyt Cleveland TillmanMichael SasoIrene BloomTu WeimingPeter Beyer
- Topics
- Chinese history and philosophy (30 papers)Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (6 papers)Japanese History and Culture (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Julia Ching
35 papers receiving 265 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Sociology and Political Science 295
- Cultural Studies 102
- Philosophy 75
- Political Science and International Relations 56
- Religious studies 52
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Ching
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Ching's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Ching with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Ching more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Ching
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Ching. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Ching. The network helps show where Julia Ching may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Ching
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Ching. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Ching based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Ching. Julia Ching is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 29 | |
| 5 | The Butterfly Healing: A Life Between East and West | 0 |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | Discovering China: European Interpretations in the Enlightenment | 12 |
| 9 | Christianisme et religion chinoise | 2 |
| 10 | Sages and filial sons : mythology and archaeology in ancient China | 7 |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Christentum und chinesische Religion | 1 |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Julia Ching
Julia Ching is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cultural Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 50 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (30 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (6 papers) and Japanese History and Culture (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (102 citations), Religious studies (52 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (295 citations). Julia Ching has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Hans Küng, William Theodore De Bary, Norman J. Girardot, Hoyt Cleveland Tillman, Michael Saso, Irene Bloom, Tu Weiming, Peter Beyer, David Dilworth and Ruth Hayhoe. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, The American Historical Review and Pacific Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.