Daniel L. Pals
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Education top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Religious studies top 2%
- Co-authors
- Stephen D. GlazierHorton DaviesRobert A. VoeksNinian SmartRobert A. SegalIvan StrenskiFrederick Mathewson DennyMartin E. Marty
- Topics
- Religion and Society Interactions (12 papers)Study and Philosophy of Religion (6 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingJournal for the Scientific Study of ReligionReview of Religious Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Daniel L. Pals
16 papers receiving 255 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Sociology and Political Science 215
- Cultural Studies 87
- Education 70
- Philosophy 65
- Religious studies 46
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel L. Pals
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel L. Pals's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel L. Pals with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel L. Pals more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel L. Pals
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel L. Pals. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel L. Pals. The network helps show where Daniel L. Pals may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel L. Pals
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel L. Pals. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel L. Pals based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel L. Pals. Daniel L. Pals is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nine Theories of Religion | 23 |
| 2 | Seven Theories of Religion : Tujuh Teori Agama Paling Komprehensif | 12 |
| 3 | Introducing Religion: Readings from the Classic Theorists | 7 |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | Eight theories of religion | 56 |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 79 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 39 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1 |
About Daniel L. Pals
Daniel L. Pals is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 18 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (12 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (6 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (87 citations), Religious studies (46 citations) and Philosophy (65 citations). Daniel L. Pals has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stephen D. Glazier, Horton Davies, Robert A. Voeks, Ninian Smart, Robert A. Segal, Ivan Strenski, Frederick Mathewson Denny, Martin E. Marty, Winthrop S. Hudson and James Hennesey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion and Review of Religious Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.