Judith Cavet

470 total citations
9 papers, 334 citations indexed

About

Judith Cavet is a scholar working on Education, Clinical Psychology and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Judith Cavet has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 334 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Education, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Judith Cavet's work include Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Children's Rights and Participation (2 papers) and Disability Rights and Representation (2 papers). Judith Cavet is often cited by papers focused on Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Children's Rights and Participation (2 papers) and Disability Rights and Representation (2 papers). Judith Cavet collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Tanzania. Judith Cavet's co-authors include Patricia Sloper, James Hogg, Barbara Potrata, Susan Blair and Alex Molassiotis and has published in prestigious journals such as Research in Developmental Disabilities, Child Care Health and Development and The British Journal of Social Work.

In The Last Decade

Judith Cavet

9 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Judith Cavet United Kingdom	8	113	77	74	64	63	9	334
Monica Dowling United States	10	79 0.7×	155 2.0×	65 0.9×	49 0.8×	93 1.5×	25	378
Jo‐Ann Sowers United States	10	41 0.4×	97 1.3×	89 1.2×	152 2.4×	103 1.6×	18	408
Sofia Santos Portugal	12	38 0.3×	138 1.8×	39 0.5×	48 0.8×	70 1.1×	57	370
Christine Baxter Australia	10	93 0.8×	248 3.2×	53 0.7×	16 0.3×	62 1.0×	23	375
Gregor Maxwell Norway	9	89 0.8×	193 2.5×	21 0.3×	29 0.5×	65 1.0×	19	309
Cheryl Grenwelge United States	6	59 0.5×	215 2.8×	30 0.4×	22 0.3×	54 0.9×	8	293
Susana Castro United Kingdom	14	60 0.5×	294 3.8×	83 1.1×	59 0.9×	158 2.5×	37	479
Madhu Pinto Canada	12	55 0.5×	210 2.7×	23 0.3×	40 0.6×	26 0.4×	23	365
Rebecca Lytle United States	12	173 1.5×	125 1.6×	81 1.1×	106 1.7×	99 1.6×	24	375
Kate Scorgie United States	10	111 1.0×	344 4.5×	41 0.6×	25 0.4×	89 1.4×	18	402

Countries citing papers authored by Judith Cavet

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Judith Cavet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith Cavet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith Cavet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Judith Cavet

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith Cavet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith Cavet. The network helps show where Judith Cavet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Judith Cavet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Judith Cavet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Judith Cavet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Judith Cavet. Judith Cavet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Potrata, Barbara, et al.. (2010). ‘Like a sieve’: an exploratory study on cognitive impairments in patients with multiple myeloma. European Journal of Cancer Care. 19(6). 721–728. 24 indexed citations

2.

Cavet, Judith & Patricia Sloper. (2004). The participation of children and young people in decisions about UK service development. Child Care Health and Development. 30(6). 613–621. 78 indexed citations

3.

Cavet, Judith & Patricia Sloper. (2004). Participation of disabled children in individual decisions about their lives and in public decisions about service development. Children & Society. 18(4). 278–290. 71 indexed citations

4.

Hogg, James, et al.. (2001). The use of ‘Snoezelen’ as multisensory stimulation with people with intellectual disabilities: a review of the research. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 22(5). 353–372. 80 indexed citations

5.

Cavet, Judith. (2000). "It's a Delicate Thing": Coping with a Hidden Disability in Mainstream Schools.. British Journal of Special Education. 27(3). 1 indexed citations

6.

Cavet, Judith. (2000). Children and young people with a hidden disability: an examination of the social work role. The British Journal of Social Work. 30(5). 619–634. 7 indexed citations

7.

Cavet, Judith. (2000). Research Section: ‘It's a Delicate Thing’: Coping with a Hidden Disability in Mainstream Schools. British Journal of Special Education. 27(3). 154–159. 8 indexed citations

8.

Hogg, James & Judith Cavet. (1995). Making Leisure Provision for People with Profound Learning and Multiple Disabilities. 13 indexed citations

9.

Cavet, Judith, et al.. (1995). Multi‐sensory environments: an exploration of their potential for young people with profound and multiple learning difficulties. British Journal of Special Education. 22(2). 52–55. 52 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact