Jothie Rajah
- Law top 1%
- Law in Society and Culture 4
- Comparative and International Law Studies 2
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 2
-
- International Law and Human Rights 3
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Asian Studies and History 4
- Socioeconomic Development in Asia 4
-
- Corporate Law and Human Rights 1
-
- Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics 1
- Co-authors
- Laurence R. HelferLeigh A. PaynePhilipp GenschelTerence C. HallidayTim BütheSally Engle MerryDaniel BodanskyEric Helleiner
- Journals
- Law & Society Review (1 paper)Annual Review of Law and Social Science (1 paper)Law & Social Inquiry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaIndia
In The Last Decade
Jothie Rajah
11 papers receiving 228 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Law 97
- Political Science and International Relations 135
- Sociology and Political Science 150
- Strategy and Management 42
- Development 8
Countries citing papers authored by Jothie Rajah
This map shows the geographic impact of Jothie Rajah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jothie Rajah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jothie Rajah more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jothie Rajah
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jothie Rajah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jothie Rajah. The network helps show where Jothie Rajah may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jothie Rajah, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 78 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 6 | Of Absences, Masks and Exceptions: Cause Lawyering in Singapore | 2014 | 3 |
| 7 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 154 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 12 | Muddling through methodology: in search of authority for discursive readings of legislation | 2009 | 1 |
About Jothie Rajah
Jothie Rajah is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and History, having authored 12 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian Studies and History (4 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (4 papers), Law in Society and Culture (4 papers), International Law and Human Rights (3 papers), Comparative and International Law Studies (2 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 papers), Corporate Law and Human Rights (1 paper) and Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (97 citations), Political Science and International Relations (135 citations), Sociology and Political Science (150 citations), Strategy and Management (42 citations) and Development (8 citations). Jothie Rajah has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and India. Frequent co-authors include Laurence R. Helfer, Leigh A. Payne, Philipp Genschel, Terence C. Halliday, Tim Büthe, Sally Engle Merry, Daniel Bodansky, Eric Helleiner, Paulette Lloyd and Gregory Shaffer. Their work appears in journals such as Law & Society Review, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Law & Social Inquiry, Law Culture and the Humanities and Hague Journal on the Rule of Law.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.