Annual Review of Law and Social Science

420 papers and 9.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 420 papers published in Annual Review of Law and Social Science in the last decades have received a total of 9.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Annual Review of Law and Social Science usually cover Sociology and Political Science (198 papers), Law (171 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (109 papers) specifically the topics of Judicial and Constitutional Studies (111 papers), Law in Society and Culture (57 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annual Review of Law and Social Science are Susan S. Silbey, Robert J. MacCoun, Mariana Valverde, Francis T. Cullen, Mark W. Lipsey, Pat O’Malley, Nikolas Rose, Tom R. Tyler, Megan Comfort and Michael W. McCann.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annual Review of Law and Social Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annual Review of Law and Social Science.

Countries where authors publish in Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annual Review of Law and Social Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annual Review of Law and Social Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annual Review of Law and Social Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025