Law Culture and the Humanities

426 papers and 1.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 426 papers published in Law Culture and the Humanities in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Law Culture and the Humanities usually cover Sociology and Political Science (172 papers), Law (169 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (127 papers) specifically the topics of Law in Society and Culture (144 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (35 papers) and Judicial and Constitutional Studies (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Law Culture and the Humanities are Andreas Philippopoulos‐Mihalopoulos, Nicholas Blomley, Sherene H. Razack, Irus Braverman, Rosemary J. Coombe, Mariana Valverde, Gary L. Francione, Roberto Esposito, Julie Stone Peters and Leti Volpp.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Law Culture and the Humanities

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Law Culture and the Humanities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Law Culture and the Humanities.

Countries where authors publish in Law Culture and the Humanities

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Law Culture and the Humanities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Law Culture and the Humanities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Law Culture and the Humanities more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025