Law Culture and the Humanities

428 papers and 1.4k indexed citations

About

The 428 papers published in Law Culture and the Humanities in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Law Culture and the Humanities usually cover Sociology and Political Science (176 papers), Law (167 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (122 papers) specifically the topics of Law in Society and Culture (143 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (36 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Law Culture and the Humanities are Nicholas Blomley, Sherene H. Razack, Gary L. Francione, Mariana Valverde, Rosemary J. Coombe, Roberto Esposito, Ben Golder, Christian Völk, Robert C. Post and Andreas Philippopoulos‐Mihalopoulos.

In The Last Decade

Law Culture and the Humanities

296 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Countries where authors publish in Law Culture and the Humanities

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Law Culture and the Humanities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Law Culture and the Humanities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Law Culture and the Humanities more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Law Culture and the Humanities

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Law Culture and the Humanities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Law Culture and the Humanities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026