Joshua van Kleef
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Genetics
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Gert StangeRichard BerryMichael R. IbbotsonTed MaddessFaran SabetiCorinne F. CarleB. DreherShaun L. Cloherty
- Topics
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments (11 papers)Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (11 papers)Glaucoma and retinal disorders (11 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of NeuroscienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesTürkiye
In The Last Decade
Joshua van Kleef
31 papers receiving 356 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 179
- Cognitive Neuroscience 113
- Ophthalmology 94
- Genetics 90
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 87
Countries citing papers authored by Joshua van Kleef
This map shows the geographic impact of Joshua van Kleef's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joshua van Kleef with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joshua van Kleef more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joshua van Kleef
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joshua van Kleef. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joshua van Kleef. The network helps show where Joshua van Kleef may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joshua van Kleef
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joshua van Kleef. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joshua van Kleef based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joshua van Kleef. Joshua van Kleef is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | Diagnostic power of rapid objective visual testing of multiple sclerosis patients | 2 |
| 11 | Per-region visual field sensitivities and delays in AMD | 2 |
| 12 | Diagnostic power of rapid ETDRS-grid matched objective perimetry in early- to late-stage AMD | 5 |
| 13 | Macular and Wide field eighty second screening tests using multifocal pupil perimetry | 1 |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 54 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 34 |
About Joshua van Kleef
Joshua van Kleef is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biophysics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (11 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (11 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (94 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (179 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (113 citations). Joshua van Kleef has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Gert Stange, Richard Berry, Michael R. Ibbotson, Ted Maddess, Faran Sabeti, Corinne F. Carle, B. Dreher, Shaun L. Cloherty, Nathan A. Crowder and Rohan W. Essex. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.