Richard Berry

1.6k total citations
30 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Richard Berry is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard Berry has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Biomaterials, 7 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 6 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Richard Berry's work include Advanced Cellulose Research Studies (10 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (7 papers) and Lignin and Wood Chemistry (6 papers). Richard Berry is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Cellulose Research Studies (10 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (7 papers) and Lignin and Wood Chemistry (6 papers). Richard Berry collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Richard Berry's co-authors include Jean Bouchard, Stephanie Beck, Kam Chiu Tam, Seyedeh Parinaz Akhlaghi, Gert Stange, Eric J. Warrant, Joshua van Kleef, N.S. Dhar, William T. Wcislo and Robert M. Olberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

In The Last Decade

Richard Berry

28 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Richard Berry Canada 14 882 346 298 178 134 30 1.2k
Edwige Moyroud United Kingdom 22 294 0.3× 916 2.6× 142 0.5× 248 1.4× 569 4.2× 37 2.0k
Alison Reed United Kingdom 7 201 0.2× 164 0.5× 98 0.3× 187 1.1× 194 1.4× 8 798
Svetlana A. Chechetka Japan 13 131 0.1× 272 0.8× 707 2.4× 63 0.4× 31 0.2× 22 1.3k
Jun Magoshi Japan 21 1.0k 1.2× 116 0.3× 171 0.6× 33 0.2× 8 0.1× 41 1.3k
Hsuan‐Chen Wu United States 24 274 0.3× 60 0.2× 765 2.6× 71 0.4× 18 0.1× 61 1.7k
Pezhman Mohammadi Finland 16 554 0.6× 93 0.3× 209 0.7× 31 0.2× 23 0.2× 30 887
Scott Payne United States 14 226 0.3× 146 0.4× 222 0.7× 64 0.4× 58 0.4× 27 812
Kay M. Cooper United States 9 293 0.3× 194 0.6× 169 0.6× 13 0.1× 198 1.5× 12 626
Gen Kamita United Kingdom 14 973 1.1× 226 0.7× 555 1.9× 505 2.8× 37 0.3× 18 1.9k
Saisai Wang China 20 77 0.1× 382 1.1× 271 0.9× 42 0.2× 31 0.2× 69 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Berry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Berry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Berry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Berry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Berry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Berry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Berry. The network helps show where Richard Berry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Berry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Berry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Berry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Berry. Richard Berry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Berry, Richard, et al.. (2020). Yielding of cellulose nanocrystal suspensions in the presence of electrolytes. Physics of Fluids. 32(9). 27 indexed citations
2.
Peng, Baoliang, Xia Han, Honglai Liu, Richard Berry, & Kam Chiu Tam. (2013). Interactions between surfactants and polymer-grafted nanocrystalline cellulose. Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 421. 142–149. 29 indexed citations
3.
Beck, Stephanie, et al.. (2013). Controlled production of patterns in iridescent solid films of cellulose nanocrystals. Cellulose. 20(3). 1401–1411. 139 indexed citations
4.
Dhar, N.S., et al.. (2012). Interactions of nanocrystalline cellulose with an oppositely charged surfactant in aqueous medium. Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 415. 310–319. 58 indexed citations
5.
Beck, Stephanie, Jean Bouchard, & Richard Berry. (2012). Dispersibility in Water of Dried Nanocrystalline Cellulose. Biomacromolecules. 13(5). 1486–1494. 272 indexed citations
6.
Beck, Stephanie, Jean Bouchard, & Richard Berry. (2010). Controlling the Reflection Wavelength of Iridescent Solid Films of Nanocrystalline Cellulose. Biomacromolecules. 12(1). 167–172. 301 indexed citations
7.
Berry, Richard & Michael R. Ibbotson. (2010). A Three-Dimensional Atlas of the Honeybee Neck. PLoS ONE. 5(5). e10771–e10771. 14 indexed citations
8.
Bouchard, Jean, et al.. (2009). The relationship found between fibre length and viscosity of three different commercial kraft pulps. Holzforschung. 63(4). 402–407. 12 indexed citations
9.
Kleef, Joshua van, Richard Berry, & Gert Stange. (2008). Directional Selectivity in the Simple Eye of an Insect. Journal of Neuroscience. 28(11). 2845–2855. 18 indexed citations
10.
Berry, Richard, Gert Stange, & Eric J. Warrant. (2007). Form vision in the insect dorsal ocelli: An anatomical and optical analysis of the dragonfly median ocellus. Vision Research. 47(10). 1394–1409. 29 indexed citations
11.
Berry, Richard, Joshua van Kleef, & Gert Stange. (2007). The mapping of visual space by dragonfly lateral ocelli. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 193(5). 495–513. 34 indexed citations
12.
Berry, Richard, Eric J. Warrant, & Gert Stange. (2007). Form vision in the insect dorsal ocelli: An anatomical and optical analysis of the Locust Ocelli. Vision Research. 47(10). 1382–1393. 24 indexed citations
13.
Stange, Gert, Richard Berry, & Joshua van Kleef. (2007). Design concepts for a novel attitude sensor for Micro Air Vehicles, based on dragonfly ocellar vision. ANU Open Research (Australian National University). 1 indexed citations
14.
Bouchard, Jean, et al.. (2006). On the relationship between fibre length, cellulose chain length and pulp viscosity of a softwood sulfite pulp. Holzforschung. 60(4). 372–377. 11 indexed citations
15.
Berry, Richard, Gert Stange, Robert M. Olberg, & Joshua van Kleef. (2006). The mapping of visual space by identified large second-order neurons in the dragonfly median ocellus. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 192(10). 1105–1123. 29 indexed citations
16.
Stange, Gert, et al.. (2006). A Biomimetic Algorithm for Flight Stabilization in Airborne Vehicles, Based on Dragonfly Ocellar Vision. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 3 indexed citations
17.
Berry, Richard, et al.. (2005). Polysulphide pulping of western softwoods: Yield benefits and effects on pulp properties. 106(3). 27–33. 3 indexed citations
18.
Bargiela, A & Richard Berry. (1999). EVERY BIT COUNTS: ENHANCING THE BENEFITS OF UTC THROUGH DISTRIBUTED APPLICATIONS. Traffic Technology International. 5 indexed citations
19.
Bargiela, A, et al.. (1999). Experiences with a distributed traffic telematics environment-portable travel information system. 2. 7–12 vol.1. 2 indexed citations
20.
Berry, Richard, et al.. (1975). Perception of Rate-Altered Sentential Approximations by Normal and Aphasic Children. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 40(3). 703–709. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026