Wolf M. Harmening

1.4k total citations
55 papers, 886 citations indexed

About

Wolf M. Harmening is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Wolf M. Harmening has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 886 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 27 papers in Ophthalmology and 21 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Wolf M. Harmening's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (26 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (21 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (17 papers). Wolf M. Harmening is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (26 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (21 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (17 papers). Wolf M. Harmening collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Wolf M. Harmening's co-authors include Hermann Wagner, Austin Roorda, Frank G. Holz, Lawrence C. Sincich, William S. Tuten, J. P. Orlowski, Kavitha Ratnam, Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg, Pavan Tiruveedhula and Johannes Birtel and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and Nature Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Wolf M. Harmening

54 papers receiving 869 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Wolf M. Harmening Germany 18 402 355 288 196 148 55 886
James A. Kuchenbecker United States 17 251 0.6× 217 0.6× 438 1.5× 160 0.8× 130 0.9× 58 1.0k
Scott B. Stevenson United States 21 343 0.9× 838 2.4× 114 0.4× 168 0.9× 478 3.2× 60 1.3k
Nancy J. Coletta United States 13 302 0.8× 443 1.2× 241 0.8× 167 0.9× 277 1.9× 27 712
Caterina Ripamonti United Kingdom 16 239 0.6× 298 0.8× 426 1.5× 76 0.4× 28 0.2× 44 959
Jack B. Calderone United States 14 143 0.4× 311 0.9× 417 1.4× 83 0.4× 42 0.3× 17 780
William S. Tuten United States 13 315 0.8× 176 0.5× 324 1.1× 159 0.8× 133 0.9× 27 625
Christopher L. Passaglia United States 15 183 0.5× 374 1.1× 259 0.9× 131 0.7× 28 0.2× 50 1.0k
Christopher S. Langlo United States 20 1.0k 2.6× 66 0.2× 691 2.4× 505 2.6× 383 2.6× 39 1.3k
Heidi Hofer United States 13 860 2.1× 561 1.6× 478 1.7× 651 3.3× 850 5.7× 23 1.8k
Matthew J. McMahon United States 15 165 0.4× 649 1.8× 419 1.5× 140 0.7× 167 1.1× 32 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Wolf M. Harmening

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wolf M. Harmening's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolf M. Harmening with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolf M. Harmening more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wolf M. Harmening

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolf M. Harmening. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolf M. Harmening. The network helps show where Wolf M. Harmening may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wolf M. Harmening

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wolf M. Harmening. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wolf M. Harmening based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wolf M. Harmening. Wolf M. Harmening is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rosselli, Federica B., Julian Bartram, Roland Diggelmann, et al.. (2025). Synchronization of visual perception within the human fovea. Nature Neuroscience. 28(9). 1959–1967. 1 indexed citations
2.
Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M., et al.. (2024). Effects of lorazepam on saccadic eye movements – evidence from prosaccade and free viewing tasks. Psychopharmacology. 242(2). 271–284. 2 indexed citations
3.
Harmening, Wolf M., et al.. (2024). Sub-cone visual resolution by active, adaptive sampling in the human foveola. eLife. 13. 2 indexed citations
4.
5.
Holz, Frank G., et al.. (2023). Cone Density Is Correlated to Outer Segment Length and Retinal Thickness in the Human Foveola. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 64(15). 11–11. 11 indexed citations
6.
Pfau, Kristina, et al.. (2022). Supernormal foveal photoreceptor density in Alport syndrome: A case report. European Journal of Ophthalmology. 33(4). NP51–NP54. 2 indexed citations
7.
Yang, Kai, et al.. (2022). Intergrader agreement of foveal cone topography measured using adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy. Biomedical Optics Express. 13(8). 4445–4445. 12 indexed citations
8.
Holz, Frank G., et al.. (2021). Human gaze is systematically offset from the center of cone topography. Current Biology. 31(18). 4188–4193.e3. 32 indexed citations
9.
Tuten, William S. & Wolf M. Harmening. (2021). Foveal vision. Current Biology. 31(11). R701–R703. 14 indexed citations
10.
Harmening, Wolf M., et al.. (2019). Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) in an animal model of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization. Experimental Eye Research. 184. 162–171. 12 indexed citations
11.
Holz, Frank G., et al.. (2019). Relationship between the foveal photoreceptor mosaic and adaptive optics corrected visual acuity. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 60(9). 1777–1777. 1 indexed citations
12.
Holz, Frank G., et al.. (2019). Eye tracking-based estimation and compensation of chromatic offsets for multi-wavelength retinal microstimulation with foveal cone precision. Biomedical Optics Express. 10(8). 4126–4126. 9 indexed citations
13.
Tuten, William S., Wolf M. Harmening, Ramkumar Sabesan, Austin Roorda, & Lawrence C. Sincich. (2017). Spatiochromatic Interactions between Individual Cone Photoreceptors in the Human Retina. Journal of Neuroscience. 37(39). 9498–9509. 29 indexed citations
14.
Harmening, Wolf M.. (2017). Kontrastempfindlichkeit und Sehschärfe bei Tieren. Der Ophthalmologe. 114(11). 986–996. 4 indexed citations
15.
Birtel, Johannes, Wolf M. Harmening, Tim U. Krohne, et al.. (2017). Retinal Injury Following Laser Pointer Exposure. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international. 114(49). 831–837. 35 indexed citations
16.
Holz, Frank G., et al.. (2017). Ultra-high contrast retinal display system for single photoreceptor psychophysics. Biomedical Optics Express. 9(1). 157–157. 19 indexed citations
17.
Tuten, William S., Wolf M. Harmening, Ramkumar Sabesan, Lawrence C. Sincich, & Austin Roorda. (2016). Psychophysical evidence for inhibitory lateral interactions between individual cones in the parafovea. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 57(12). 1 indexed citations
18.
Harmening, Wolf M., William S. Tuten, Austin Roorda, & Lawrence C. Sincich. (2014). Mapping the Perceptual Grain of the Human Retina. Journal of Neuroscience. 34(16). 5667–5677. 67 indexed citations
19.
Harmening, Wolf M., et al.. (2009). Spatial contrast sensitivity and grating acuity of barn owls. Journal of Vision. 9(7). 13–13. 55 indexed citations
20.
Harmening, Wolf M., et al.. (2007). Ocular aberrations in barn owl eyes. Vision Research. 47(23). 2934–2942. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026